Methods of preparing single-walled carbon nanotube networks

ABSTRACT

Methods for determining desired doping conditions for a semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube (s-SWCNT) are provided. One exemplary method includes doping each of a plurality of s-SWCNT networks under a respective set of doping conditions; determining a thermoelectric (TE) power factor as a function of a fractional bleach of an absorption spectrum for the plurality of s-SWCNT networks doped under the respective sets of doping conditions; and using the function to identify one of the TE power factors within a range of the fractional bleach of the absorption spectrum. The identified TE power factor corresponds to the desired doping conditions.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority as a continuation-in-part to U.S.Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 16/784,892, filed on Feb. 7,2020, which claims priority as a divisional application to parent U.S.Non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/741,895, filed on Jan. 4,2018, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 371 to PCT PatentApplication No. PCT/US16/42085, filed on Jul. 13, 2016, which claimspriority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationNo. 62/191,911, filed on Jul. 13, 2015, U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 62/211,064, filed on Aug. 28, 2015, and U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 62/316,709, filed on Apr. 1, 2016, the contentsof which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

CONTRACTUAL ORIGIN

The United States Government has rights in this invention under ContractNo. DE-AC36-08G028308 between the United States Department of Energy andthe Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, the Manager and Operator ofthe National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to single-walled carbon nanotubes(SWCNTs), which may be used for thermoelectric (TE) power generation.The development of inexpensive and efficient TE materials offers theprospect of converting waste heat into pollution-free electricity instandalone power generation systems, cogeneration architectures (e.g.,coupled to a photovoltaic module), and/or cooling systems (e.g.,microprocessor cooling). It is desirable for efficient TE materials tobe good at conducting electricity but not heat, so that a thermalgradient may be maintained to produce the TE effect. However, this ischallenging for most material systems, because the electrical andthermal conductivities are typically related to each other via thecharge carrier density, such that the thermal conductivity increases asthe electrical conductivity increases. Decoupling the electrical andthermal conductivities has been achieved in some inorganicsemiconductors (ISCs), such as bismuth telluride (Bi₂Te₃), althoughfurther improvements in these materials are likely to require thedevelopment of complex and/or nanoscale structures. Complex fabricationstrategies, combined with material cost, scarcity, toxicity, anddisposal, may significantly limit the potential for large-scaledeployment of TE devices based on such materials.

The size-tunable physical properties of solution-phase processablenanomaterials may enable diverse strategies for energyharvesting/storage and inexpensive, bottom-up approaches for fabricatingdevices with unique form and function (e.g., flexible, lightweight,and/or wearable). Nanostructuring of bulk ISCs has shown particularpromise for improving TE energy conversion devices, which convertthermal energy from waste and natural heat sources into electricity, dueto the beneficial formation of nanoscale interfaces. However, thebest-performing ISCs are incompatible with applications that require theTE generator to adopt irregular, or even flexible, form factors.

In contrast, nanostructured organic semiconductors (OSCs), includingSWCNTs, offer a number of intriguing technological characteristics forTE applications, such as earth-abundant raw materials, low-costdeposition, and flexible form factors. Despite their promisingelectronic properties, SWCNTs have received little attention in thecontext of TE energy conversion, although several studies have focusedon the use of SWCNTs as inclusions in composite materials based onconducting polymers. Two recent studies demonstrated higher thermopowersfor films enriched in semiconducting (s-SWCNT) species than thosecontaining significant fractions of metallic (m-SWCNT) species. Beyondthese results, little has been known about the detailed dependence ofthe TE power factor and the thermal conductivity on the SWCNT diameter,electronic structure, and carrier density. Although large thermalconductivities (κ>1,000 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹) have been observed for individualSWCNTs, much lower values (κ<35 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹) have been obtained for matsof nanotube ropes or bundles.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide methods for determiningdesired doping conditions for a semiconducting single-walled carbonnanotube (s-SWCNT). One exemplary method includes doping each of aplurality of s-SWCNT networks under a respective set of dopingconditions; determining a TE power factor as a function of a fractionalbleach of an absorption spectrum for the plurality of s-SWCNT networksdoped under the respective sets of doping conditions; and using thefunction to identify one of the TE power factors within a range of thefractional bleach of the absorption spectrum, wherein the identified TEpower factor corresponds to the desired doping conditions.

The doping may include immersing the s-SWCNT network in a solutioncomprising a charge-transfer dopant until a charge carrier doping levelof the s-SWCNT network is saturated; and subsequently reducing thecharge carrier doping level of the s-SWCNT network. The charge-transferdopant may include triethyloxonium hexachloroantimonate (OA).

Alternatively, the doping may include sequentially immersing the s-SWCNTnetwork in solutions comprising increasing concentrations of thecharge-transfer dopant. The charge-transfer dopant may include OA.

The method may include controlling a band gap of the s-SWCNT network byadjusting a diameter of carbon nanotubes of the s-SWCNT network. Theband gap may be controlled to have a value between approximately 1.0 eVand approximately 1.2 eV.

The method may also include removing at least a portion of a polymerwrapped around carbon nanotubes of the s-SWCNT network. Further, themethod may also include, before determining the desired dopingconditions, selectively extracting s-SWCNTs from polydisperse SWCNT sootusing polyfluorene-based polymers; and performing ultrasonic spraydeposition of the s-SWCNTs to form the s-SWCNT networks.

The method may also include doping an s-SWCNT network under the desireddoping conditions. The identified TE power factor may be a maximum TEpower factor within the range of the fractional bleach of the absorptionspectrum. The identified TE power factor may be at least 340 μW m⁻¹ K⁻².

According to another aspect of the invention, a composition is provided.The composition includes a doped s-SWCNT network, wherein the s-SWCNTnetwork has a TE power factor of at least 340 μW m⁻¹ K⁻². The s-SWCNTnetwork may have a band gap between approximately 1.0 eV andapproximately 1.2 eV. The s-SWCNT network may be doped with OA.

Other objects, advantages, and novel features of the present inventionwill become apparent from the following detailed description of theinvention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying figures.

An aspect of the present disclosure is a composition that includes anetwork of a semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube (s-SWCNT), anda thermoelectric (TE) power factor between about 180 μW m⁻¹K⁻² and about900 μW m⁻¹K⁻². In some embodiments of the present disclosure, thecomposition may further include an electronic band gap between about 0.8eV and about 1.2 eV. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, thecomposition may further include a dopant that includes aboron-containing compound.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the dopant may be ap-type dopant and/or an n-type dopant. In some embodiments of thepresent disclosure, the dopant may be a p-type dopant. In someembodiments of the present disclosure, the boron-containing compound mayinclude dodecaborane. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, thedodecaborane may be functionalized with a group that includes at leastone of 4-trifluoromethylbenzyloxy, 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyloxy,and/or 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyloxy.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the s-SWCNT may have anaverage diameter between about 0.7 nm and about 2.0 nm. In someembodiments of the present disclosure, the average diameter may bebetween about 1.0 nm and about 1.1 nm. In some embodiments of thepresent disclosure, at least a portion of the s-SWCNT may be a chiralspecies. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the s-SWCNT mayinclude a plurality of chiral species.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the composition mayfurther include a fluorene-based polymer. In some embodiments of thepresent disclosure, the fluorene-based polymer may include at least oneofpoly[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-co-(6,6″-{2,2″-bipyridine})],poly[(9,9-dihexylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-co-(9,10-anthracene)],poly(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl), and/or poly[(9,9-di-n-dodecyl-2,7-fluorendiyl-dimethine)-(1,4-phenylene-dinitrilomethine)](PFPD)]. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a ratio of thes-SWCNT to the fluorene-based polymer may be between about 1:0 and about1:4.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the composition may havea carrier density between about 1×10¹⁷ holes/cm³ and about 1×10²⁰holes/cm³. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the networkmay include a bundle of the s-SWCNT having a size between about 5 nm andabout 50 nm. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, thecomposition may have an electrical conductivity between about 10³ S/mand about 10⁵ S/m. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, thecomposition may have a thermopower between about 100 μV/K and about 200μV/K.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1(a) and 1(b) show atomic force microscopy (AFM) images andcorresponding schematics of a nanocomposite network with s-SWCNTinclusions dispersed in a polymer matrix and a network of polymer-frees-SWCNTs, respectively;

FIGS. 2(a)-2(e) show density functional theory (DFT) calculations ofthermopower for m-SWCNTs and s-SWCNTs;

FIG. 3 shows unit cells of SWCNTs;

FIGS. 4(a)-4(d) show dispersions of enriched s-SWCNTs and deposition ofwell-coupled s-SWCNT thin films;

FIGS. 5(a)-5(d) show the surface topography of a typical laservaporization (LV) film prepared by ultrasonic spraying from a PFH-Adispersion;

FIG. 6 shows a comparison of the optoelectronic properties of dopedpolymer:LV s-SWCNT networks with doped pristine SWCNT networks;

FIGS. 7(a)-7(d) show a comparison of absorbance spectra for undoped andheavily doped polymer:LV networks and polymers in dichloroethane (DCE)solution;

FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b) show x-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of undopedand heavily doped poly(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl) (PFO):(7,5)s-SWCNT networks and PFO films;

FIGS. 9(a)-9(g) show p-type doping of s-SWCNT networks with OA;

FIG. 10 shows the integrated density of states (DOS) for asemiconducting carbon nanotube;

FIG. 11 shows the ratio of chlorine to antimony in doped PFO:SG65 (7,5)s-SWCNT networks;

FIGS. 12(a)-12(f) show TE properties of various polyfluorine/s-SWCNTthin films;

FIGS. 13(a)-13(d) show a micromachined suspended silicon-nitride (Si—N)thermal isolation platform;

FIGS. 14(a)-14(d) show the temperature-dependent TE properties ofundoped and doped PFO-BPy:LV s-SWCNT networks.

FIGS. 15(a)-15(c) show the temperature dependence of the TE propertiesof a moderately doped PFO-BPy:LV s-SWCNT network;

FIGS. 16(a) and 16(b) show doping “hysteresis” in TE properties ofPFH-A:HiPCO networks;

FIGS. 17(a)-17(f) compare characteristics of s-SWCNT networks havingpolymer-wrapped tubes with s-SWCNT networks without the polymer-wrappedtubes;

FIG. 18 shows a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) absorption spectrum ofan s-SWCNT network;

FIGS. 19(a)-19(b) show the TE properties of s-SWCNT networks havingpolymer-wrapped tubes and s-SWCNT networks without the polymer-wrappedtubes;

FIGS. 20(a)-20(i) show the absorbance, electrical conductivity, and TEpower factor of s-SWCNT networks having polymer-wrapped tubes ands-SWCNT networks without the polymer-wrapped tubes;

FIGS. 21(a)-21(c) show more detailed absorption spectra of s-SWCNTnetworks having polymer-wrapped tubes and s-SWCNT networks without thepolymer-wrapped tubes;

FIG. 22 shows chemical structures of p-type charge-transfer dopants;

FIG. 23 shows electrical conductivity (σ) versus fractional bleach ofthe s-SWCNT absorbance transitions (ΔA/A₀);

FIG. 24 shows thermopower (α) versus electrical conductivity (σ) fordoped PT s-SWCNT networks, illustrating the enhanced thermopower for thedodecaborane-doped samples; and

FIG. 25 shows thermoelectric power factor (α²σ) versus electricalconductivity (σ) for doped PT s-SWCNT networks, illustrating theenhanced power factor for the dodecaborane-doped samples.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The embodiments described herein should not necessarily be construed aslimited to addressing any of the particular problems or deficienciesdiscussed herein. References in the specification to “one embodiment”,“an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, “some embodiments”, etc.,indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature,structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarilyinclude the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover,such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment.Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic isdescribed in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it iswithin the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature,structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodimentswhether or not explicitly described.

As used herein the term “substantially” is used to indicate that exactvalues are not necessarily attainable. By way of example, one ofordinary skill in the art will understand that in some chemicalreactions 100% conversion of a reactant is possible, yet unlikely. Mostof a reactant may be converted to a product and conversion of thereactant may asymptotically approach 100% conversion. So, although froma practical perspective 100% of the reactant is converted, from atechnical perspective, a small and sometimes difficult to define amountremains. For this example of a chemical reactant, that amount may berelatively easily defined by the detection limits of the instrument usedto test for it. However, in many cases, this amount may not be easilydefined, hence the use of the term “substantially”. In some embodimentsof the present invention, the term “substantially” is defined asapproaching a specific numeric value or target to within 20%, 15%, 10%,5%, or within 1% of the value or target. In further embodiments of thepresent invention, the term “substantially” is defined as approaching aspecific numeric value or target to within 1%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6%,0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, or 0.1% of the value or target.

As used herein, the term “about” is used to indicate that exact valuesare not necessarily attainable. Therefore, the term “about” is used toindicate this uncertainty limit. In some embodiments of the presentinvention, the term “about” is used to indicate an uncertainty limit ofless than or equal to ±20%, ±15%, ±10%, ±5%, or ±1% of a specificnumeric value or target. In some embodiments of the present invention,the term “about” is used to indicate an uncertainty limit of less thanor equal to ±1%, ±0.9%, ±0.8%, ±0.7%, ±0.6%, ±0.5%, ±0.4%, ±0.3%, ±0.2%,or ±0.1% of a specific numeric value or target.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide s-SWCNT networks with acarefully controlled chirality distribution (or bandgap) and carrierdensity that are capable of achieving large TE power factors, higherthan 340 μW m⁻¹ K⁻², comparable to the best-performing conductingpolymers and larger than previously observed for carbon nanotube films.Controlling the carrier doping according to exemplary embodiments of theinvention significantly reduces the thermal conductivity κ relative toundoped s-SWCNT networks. Removing a polymer wrapped around the carbonnanotubes improves the TE properties of the s-SWCNT networks.

The TE performance of a material is represented by the dimensionlessfigure-of-merit zT=(α²σ)T/κ, where α is the thermopower (Seebeckcoefficient), σ is the electrical conductivity, α²σ is the TE powerfactor, κ is the thermal conductivity, and T is the absolutetemperature. The thermopower a is the electromotive force ΔV generatedacross a material when it is subjected to the temperature difference ΔT,and is given by α=ΔV/ΔT. The TE power factor α²σ may be controlled whenoptimizing the figure-of-merit zT of a material system. To achieve ahigh figure-of-merit zT, the TE power factor α²σ may be maximized whilemaintaining a low thermal conductivity κ.

FIGS. 1(a) and 1(b) show AFM images and corresponding schematics of ananocomposite network with s-SWCNT inclusions dispersed in a polymermatrix and a network of polymer-free s-SWCNTs, respectively. In bothcases, the networks can include individual s-SWCNTs and bundles or ropesof s-SWCNTs. It is possible to control thermal and electrical transportproperties by reducing the dimensionality of a sample. On a smallerlength scale, boundary interfaces and inclusions introduce interfacesthat can be effective scattering centers for vibrons or phonons, orallow transmission of only high energy electrons.

As discussed in further detail below, according to exemplary embodimentsof the present invention, s-SWCNTs are enriched with any suitablematerial, such as conjugated polymers or copolymers based on variouschemical moieties (for example, fluorene, thiophene, carbazole, etc.),DNA, or surfactants, and are extracted from raw SWCNT soot, which may bea raw nanotube material. The s-SWCNTs are composed of carbon atoms, butmay include substitutionally-doped elements, such as nitrogen or boronatoms, in place of some carbon atoms. Uniform thin films of s-SWCNTs arethen formed by any suitable method, such as ultrasonic spraying. Nextthe s-SWCNT films are doped using a thermally stable p-type or n-typedopant. Any suitable charge-transfer dopant, such as Lewis acids orbases (such as 2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoro-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F4-TCNQ),triethyloxonium hexachloroantimonate (OA), hydrazine, and/orethylenediamine), and/or Bronsted-Lowry acids or bases (such as nitricacid, sulfuric acid, and/or trifluoroacetic acid), may be used. Lewis orBronsted acids will generate p-type s-SWCNT networks (where holes aremajority carriers), and Lewis or Bronsted bases will generate n-types-SWCNT networks (where electrons are majority carriers). The dopinglevel is tuned via the amount of adsorbed dopant. By tuning the dopinglevel, the TE power factor α²σ may be optimized.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide thin films of apotentially inexpensive organic material that can efficiently convertwaste heat to electricity. As discussed above, exemplary methods useenriched s-SWCNTs and tune their TE properties by using controllableamounts of dopant molecules to tune the Fermi energy of the s-SWCNTsthat constitute the film. The s-SWCNTs may also have tunable colors,which may be used in TE fabrics, because they are nanomaterials withdiameter-tunable bandgaps. The polymer, the diameter distribution, theelectronic structure of particular s-SWCNTs, and/or the overallcomposition of the network may be adjusted to define the TE propertiesof the film. For example, if specific polymers provide large TE powerfactors α²σ, these polymers may be engineered into the composite toachieve higher TE power factors α²σ by providing an increase in thethermopower α at high electrical conductivity σ. Similarly, if specifics-SWCNT densities of states provide large TE power factors α²σ, theses-SWCNT densities may be engineered into the composite to achieve higherTE power factors α²σ by providing an increase in the thermopower α athigh electrical conductivity σ.

In addition, highly pure single-chirality s-SWCNTs may be incorporatedinto otherwise polydisperse s-SWCNT composites. This may provideadvantageously high thermopowers α at very high electricalconductivities. Further, films may be fabricated with tailored isotopic(or atomic) compositions to rationally incorporate phonon scatteringcenters. This may provide advantageously low thermal conductivitieswhile maintaining the high thermopowers α and high electricalconductivities.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may maintain a very highthermopower α in an SWCNT while simultaneously realizing high electricalconductivity σ. These two properties define the TE power factor α²σwithin the TE figure-of-merit zT and are very hard to optimizesimultaneously because they typically vary inversely with respect toeach other. At low carrier densities, the thermopower α is typicallyhigh, while the electrical conductivity σ is low. As the carrier densityrises, the thermopower α falls and the electrical conductivity σ rises.Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may utilize s-SWCNTssurrounded by a fluorene-based polymer or co-polymer host as a materialthat can be optimized by tuning the Fermi energy. This type oftunability may not be possible in films containing both s-SWCNTs andm-SWCNTs, because m-SWCNTs have a finite density of states (DOS) at allenergies, resulting in a low intrinsic thermopower α, and are very hardto tune via molecular doping. Further, exemplary embodiments of thepresent invention utilize the extreme sensitivity of fluorene-basedpolymers or co-polymers for extracting high yields of s-SWCNTs. Thesepolymers enable highly selective dispersion of particular distributionsof SWCNTs, and these distributions can be sensitively tuned by choosingthe appropriate polymer and SWCNT synthesis conditions, as discussed infurther detail below.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide methods for fabricatingand doping TE materials based on enriched s-SWCNTs. Experimental datahas verified theoretical predictions that suggest that the thermopower αfor s-SWCNTs can greatly exceed those experimentally obtained in relatedart studies (500 μV K⁻¹) at low doping densities. By controlling thedoping conditions, thermopower α values can be maintained well over 100μV K⁻¹ even at very high carrier densities and electrical conductivity σvalues, providing an optimu TE power factor α²σ of approximately 340 μWm⁻¹ K⁻² for s-SWCNTs with an electronic band gap of approximately 1.0 eVto 1.2 eV. The doping method according to exemplary embodiments of theinvention significantly hinders the vibron/phonon contribution thatdominates the thermal conductivity κ in undoped carbon nanotubenetworks.

First-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the DOSand thermopower for representative m- and s-SWCNTs have been performed.In the diffusive transport regime, the thermopower can be expressed withthe Mott formula:

$\begin{matrix}{{\alpha (E)} = {- {\frac{1}{eT}\left\lbrack \frac{\int{{\sigma (E)}\left( {E - E_{f}} \right)\left( {- \frac{\partial f}{\partial E}} \right)dE}}{\int{{\sigma (E)}\left( {- \frac{\partial f}{\partial E}} \right)dE}} \right\rbrack}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

The energy-dependent electrical conductivity is given byσ(E)=e²Ne(E)D(E), a product of the DOS and diffusion constant, whichboth depend on energy. In the low-temperature approximation, thethermopower value can be expressed as a log term:

$\begin{matrix}{{\alpha (E)} = {{- \frac{\pi^{2}}{3}}{\frac{k_{B}^{2}T}{e}\left\lbrack \frac{\partial{\ln \left\lbrack {\sigma \left( {E,\overset{\rightarrow}{r}} \right)} \right\rbrack}}{\partial E} \right\rbrack}_{E - E_{f}}}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

and the thermopower approximately equates to the addition of a ballisticterm and a diffusive term, α≈α_(ball)+α_(diff). Thus the totalthermopower can be written as:

$\begin{matrix}{{\alpha (E)} = {- {\frac{1}{eT}\left\lbrack {\frac{\int{{N_{e}(E)}\left( {E - E_{f}} \right)\left( {- \frac{\partial f}{\partial E}} \right)dE}}{\int{{N_{e}(E)}\left( {- \frac{\partial f}{\partial E}} \right)dE}} + \frac{\int{{D(E)}\left( {E - E_{f}} \right)\left( {- \frac{\partial f}{\partial E}} \right)dE}}{\int{{D(E)}\left( {- \frac{\partial f}{\partial E}} \right)dE}}} \right\rbrack}_{E = E_{f}}}} & (3)\end{matrix}$

where the first term describes the ballistic contribution, due to theshape of the DOS, and the second term describes the diffusivecontribution. In this example, only the ballistic contribution to thethermopower was calculated. Initial work suggests that the diffusiveterm is a simple constant with the same sign as the ballistic term,meaning that the total achievable thermopower may be slightly largerthan is estimated here.

In the low-temperature approximation, the thermopower value can beexpressed as a log term:

$\begin{matrix}{{\alpha \left( E_{f} \right)} = {{- \frac{\pi^{2}}{3}}{\frac{k_{B}^{2}T}{e}\left\lbrack {\frac{\partial{\ln \left\lbrack {N(E)} \right\rbrack}}{\partial E} + \frac{\partial{\ln \left\lbrack {D(E)} \right\rbrack}}{\partial E}} \right\rbrack}_{E = E_{f}}}} & (4)\end{matrix}$

where E is the energy, E_(f) is the energy of the Fermi level, the firstterm inside the square brackets is the ballistic (or intrinsic)contribution to the thermopower due to the shape of the DOS N(E), thesecond term is the diffusive (or extrinsic) contribution, due to theenergy-dependence of the diffusion coefficient D(E), k_(B) is theBoltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and e is elementarycharge. In this example, only the ballistic contribution to thethermopower was calculated based on Equation (4), but the contributionfrom the diffusive component could also be determined as discussedabove.

In this example, Projected-Augmented Wave (PAW) andPerdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional wereemployed as implemented in Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP). Aplane wave basis set with a kinetic energy cutoff of 400 eV was used,and all atomic positions were relaxed until forces are less than 0.025eV/Å. For the calculations of the electronic DOS, the (500×1×1),(40×1×1) and (20×1×1) Γ-centered k-points samplings were used for (9,9),(7,5) and (10,8) SWCNT, respectively, and a Gaussian broadening of 0.02eV was applied.

FIGS. 2(a)-2(e) show DFT calculations of thermopower α for m-SWCNTs ands-SWCNTs. FIG. 2(a) shows the unit cells for three of the five SWCNTscalculated: the (7,5) and (10,8) s-SWCNTs are representative of thesmall-diameter carbon monoxide disproportionation (CoMoCAT®) andlarge-diameter laser vaporization (LV) samples, respectively, whereasthe (9,9) is representative of large-diameter m-SWCNTs. FIGS. 2(b)-1(d)show the thermopower α (top panels) as a function of Fermi energyposition within the electronic DOS (bottom panels) for the same threeSWCNTs, where the zero energy was fixed to the Fermi energy position ofundoped SWCNTs. FIG. 2(e) shows a comparison of the DFT-calculated peakthermopower a for all five SWCNT species.

As discussed above, the primary representative semiconducting speciesstudied by DFT were the (7,5) and (10,8) s-SWCNTs, whereas the primarymetallic species was the (9,9) m-SWCNT. For the calculations of theelectronic DOS, the (500×1×1), (40×1×1) and (20×1×1) F-centered k-pointssamplings were used for (9,9), (7,5) and (10,8) SWCNT, respectively, anda Gaussian broadening of 0.02 eV was applied. In order to rule outpossible effects due to the reduced size of the unit cell of the (9,9)m-SWCNT, calculations were also carried out on the zigzag (10,0) and(16,0) s-SWCNTs, which have similar diameters to the (7,5) and (10,9)s-SWCNTs, respectively, but much smaller unit cells, similar in size tothe (9,9) m-SWCNT. FIG. 3 shows the unit cells of the five main SWCNTchiralities considered in the DFT calculations.

The DFT calculations demonstrate that the peak of the intrinsicthermopower a of two model s-SWCNTs is nearly an order of magnitudehigher than that of the (9,9) m-SWCNT, qualitatively consistent withrecent experimental results from the related art. However, the magnitudeof the predicted thermopowers α for the s-SWCNTs is dramatically higherthan values obtained in recent experiments from the related art. A smallFermi energy shift, ΔE_(F), of only approximately 60 meV in eitherdirection produces the maximum thermopower α of approximately 1,300 μVK⁻¹ and 800 μV K⁻¹ for the (7,5) and (10,8) s-SWCNTs shown in FIG. 2(b),respectively, nearly an order of magnitude higher than the highestvalues previously observed experimentally (approximately 160 μV K⁻¹).While the thermopower α decays monotonically with increasing ΔE_(F), thecalculations suggest that the thermopower α within controllably dopeds-SWCNTs can remain well above 100 μV K⁻¹ for sizable shifts in theFermi energy; for example, α for the (7,5) s-SWCNT is 200 μV K⁻¹ forΔE_(F)≈0.4 eV. FIG. 2(c) summarizes the peak DFT-calculated thermopowersα for five different SWCNTs, demonstrating that the DFT-calculatedmaximum thermopower α for all four s-SWCNTs was dramatically higher thanthe (9,9) m-SWCNT. Thermopowers α of this magnitude, paired with thealready well-documented high electrical conductivities of dopeds-SWCNTs, promises significant technological potential for thesematerials in TE devices.

Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide highly tailored s-SWCNTthin films with finely controlled SWCNT chirality distribution andcarrier density. FIGS. 4(a)-4(d) show dispersions of enriched s-SWCNTsand deposition of well-coupled s-SWCNT thin films. FIG. 4(a) showschemical structures of three examples of fluorene-based polymers orco-polymers that may be used to disperse enriched s-SWCNTs. FIG. 4(b)shows representative absorbance spectra for PFO/SG65 (7,5), PFH-A:HiPCO,PFO-BPy:LV, and PFO-BPy:Tuball s-SWCNT dispersions, with average SWCNTdiameters (electronic band gaps) of 0.8 nm (1.5 eV), 1.1 nm (1.1 eV),1.3 nm (0.95 eV), and 1.8 nm (0.7 eV), respectively. FIG. 4(c) showsabsorbance spectra of solution-phase and thin film samples of PFO/SG65(7,5) s-SWCNT. The dotted line shows the absorbance spectrum of the thinfilm after heavy p-type doping by OA. FIG. 4(d) shows a representativetopographic atomic force micrograph of a PFO-BPy/LV thin film. Theseabsorbance measurements were performed on a Cary 500 spectrophotometer,with a step size of 2 nm and scan speed of 600 nm/min (equivalent to anintegration time of 0.2 seconds per point). In the case ofsolution-phase measurements, a cuvette with blank solvent was used asthe baseline. For film measurements, a blank glass slide was used as abaseline.

To generate enriched semiconducting samples, s-SWCNTs may be selectivelyextracted from polydisperse SWCNT soot using fluorene-based polymers orco-polymers, such as those shown in FIG. 4(a). Fluorene-based polymersand co-polymers have shown very high selectivity for s-SWCNTs, atequally impressive yield and throughput over a large range of diameters,with recent field effect transistor (FET) studies suggesting m-SWCNTimpurity of levels of ≤0.02%. All samples shown in FIG. 4(b) exhibitm-SWCNT impurities that are essentially undetectable by absorbance andRaman spectroscopy, although these techniques do not allow for aquantitative estimate for the s-SWCNT purity level beyond approximately99%.

For example, to prepare polymer:s-SWCNT dispersions, four differentSWCNT source materials may be used: (1) SWCNTs synthesized by LV at afurnace temperature of approximately 1125° C.; (2) commercially obtained“SG65i” material synthesized from cobalt molybdenum catalysis ofCoMoCAT®; (3) commercially obtained raw HiPCO® material synthesized byhigh-pressure disproportionation of CO; and (4) commercially obtainedraw Tuball™ SWCNTs. The raw LV SWCNTs, HiPCO® SWCNTs, and Tuball™ SWCNTsare all presumed to contain metallic and semiconducting tubes in aroughly 1:3 ratio, whereas the CoMoCAT® material is enriched in s-SWCNTsand the (6,5) s-SWCNT in particular. The SWCNTs may be dispersed in afluorene-based polymer or co-polymer solution generated by dissolvingpolymer in toluene at a concentration between 0.4-2 mg/mL. The polymersused may includepoly[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-co-(6,6′-{2,2″-bipyridine})](PFO-BPy), poly [(9,9-dihexylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-co-(9,10-anthracene)](PFH-A), and/or poly(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl) (PFO). Thesefluorene-based polymers selectively wrap s-SWCNTs, allowing for a SWCNTdispersion with a less than 1% m-SWCNT impurity level. Although thesethree fluorene-based polymers select only semiconducting tubes, eachpolymer selects a different population of s-SWCNTs. PFO-BPy selectslarge diameter tubes with no preference for particular chiralities,PFH-A selects near-armchair s-SWCNTs and disperses a much narrowerchirality distribution, and PFO selects only (7,5) tubes from the SG65imaterial even though the precursor material is predominantly composed of(6,5) s-SWCNTs. For further detail concerning the technique forgenerating high-yield dispersions of s-SWCNTs using a fluorene-basedsemiconducting polymer that selectively wraps semiconducting nanotubeswith a range of large diameters, see Guillot, S. L. et al. Precisionprinting and optical modeling of ultrathin SWCNT/C₆₀ heterojunctionsolar cells. Nanoscale 7, 6556-6566 (2015) and Misty, K. S., Larsen, B.A. & Blackburn, J. L. High-Yield Dispersions of Large-DiameterSemiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Tunable NarrowChirality Distributions. ACS Nano 7, 2231-2239 (2013), the entiredisclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.

The diameter (or band gap) is determined by the synthetic conditionsused to make the s-SWCNT networks. For example, polymers such as PFO,PFH-A, PFO-BPy, SMP, PF-PD, or similar fluorene-based polymers orco-polymers may be used to control which specific s-SWCNTs are selectedfrom the raw starting material. The band gap may be controlled to haveany suitable value. For example, for reasons discussed in further detailbelow, the band gap may be controlled to have a value betweenapproximately 1.0 eV and approximately 1.2 eV. For example, the polymerPFH-A and the HiPCO® material may be used to achieve this band gap. TheHiPCO® material contains a distribution of s-SWCNTs whose band gaps lieclose to this range, and the chemical interactions between PFH-A and aspecific subset of s-SWCNTs results in a sample enriched in s-SWCNTswith a band gap of approximately 1.1 eV. The subset of s-SWCNTs isdetermined by the choice of starting SWCNT material and the conjugatedpolymer. This combination may be determined by any suitable method, suchas the method disclosed in Mistry, K. S., Larsen, B. A. & Blackburn, J.L. High-Yield Dispersions of Large-Diameter Semiconducting Single-WalledCarbon Nanotubes with Tunable Narrow Chirality Distributions. ACS Nano7, 2231-2239 (2013), the entire disclosure of which is incorporatedherein by reference.

Once the s-SWCNTs are dispersed in the polymer, the majority of theexcess polymer may be removed during consecutive 20-hour ultracentrifugeruns until the solution reaches a mass ratio between 1:1 and 2:1polymer:s-SWCNTs, which is determined after each centrifuge run from theabsorption spectra of the solution using the Beer-Lambert Law A=εcl,where A is the absorbance, ε is the decadic molar extinctioncoefficient, c is the concentration, and l is the path length.

The high quality s-SWCNT networks shown in FIGS. 4(c) and 4(d) may beprepared by a suitable ultrasonic spray deposition technique, such asthose described in Guillot, S. L. et al. Precision printing and opticalmodeling of ultrathin SWCNT/C₆₀ heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale 7,6556-6566 (2015) and Dowgiallo, A.-M., Mistry, K. S., Johnson, J. C. &Blackburn, J. L. Ultrafast Spectroscopic Signature of Charge Transferbetween Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and C₆₀ . ACS Nano 8, 8573-8581(2014), the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by referenceherein. In one example, the ultrasonic sprayer utilized a Sonotek 120kHz Impact nozzle. Room temperature SWCNT ink was sprayed at 300 μl/minunder nitrogen flowing at 7 std L/min with 0.8 Watt ultrasonic sprayhead power. The substrate was heated to 130±10° C. while spraying. Thesprayed s-SWCNT films were soaked in toluene for 10-20 minutes at 78° C.to remove excess fluorene-based polymer or co-polymer. Film thicknesswas controlled by the concentration of the s-SWCNT ink and the number ofsprayer passes, and was measured directly by atomic force microscopy(AFM) for the toluene-soaked films.

FIGS. 5(a)-5(d) show profilometry and AFM measurements of representatives-SWCNT films and demonstrate that the films are uniform over largeareas with low surface roughness. FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b) show opticalmicrographs before and after a toluene soak treatment, respectively. Theas-deposited film in FIG. 5(a) exhibits severe surface roughness due tothe accumulation of excess polymer, which can be removed by a hottoluene soak, leaving the very smooth film shown in FIG. 5(b). FIG. 5(c)shows an AFM micrograph of the surface of a s-SWCNT network after thetoluene soak treatment. FIG. 5(d) shows a height profile determined forthe dashed line shown in FIG. 5(c), indicating that the toluenetreatment results in a smooth s-SWCNT network (root-mean-square surfaceroughness R_(q)<8 nm).

In the example discussed above, after the initial film deposition, atoluene soak removed excess fluorene-based polymer or co-polymer,leaving polymer wrapped s-SWCNTs in a mass ratio of approximately 1:1polymer:s-SWCNTs, and enabling close physical contact and efficientelectronic coupling between s-SWCNTs, as indicated by broadened excitontransitions such as those shown in FIG. 4(c). The films weresubsequently fully doped by immersing in a solution of OA, which is astrong one-electron oxidant. In this example, to achieve full doping,the films were submerged in a concentrated solution of OA in DCE at 78°C. for a minimum of approximately 1 minute in a bath of greater than 1mg/mL OA solution in DCE. However, any other suitable conditions,solution, and/or solvent may be used. Here,“full doping” is defined asthe doping level at which further increases in the concentration and/orimmersing time do not produce additional changes to the absorptionspectrum or film conductivity.

The large density of holes (approximately 1×10²⁰ cm⁻³ for a fully dopedfilm) injected by adsorbed OA molecules strongly bleaches the excitontransitions of the s-SWCNTs, as shown by the dashed line labeled“heavily doped film” in FIG. 4(c), and dramatically increases theelectrical conductivity σ of the film. The bleach, or reduction in theintensity, of the S₁₁ absorption band provides a qualitative indicationof the carrier doping of the carbon nanotubes, where the magnitude ofthe bleach is dependent on the carrier doping density (i.e., largercarrier densities result in more pronounced bleaching). The relativebleach of the S₁₁ absorption band, ΔA/A₀ (S₁₁), is given by:

$\begin{matrix}{{\frac{\Delta A}{A_{0}}\left( S_{11} \right)} = \frac{{Area_{S_{11}}^{undoped}} - {Area_{S_{11}}^{doped}}}{Area_{S_{11}}^{undoped}}} & (5)\end{matrix}$

where Area_(S) ₁₁ ^(undoped) and Area_(S) ₁₁ ^(doped) are the areasunder the S₁₁ absorption peak for the undoped and doped samples,respectively. Exemplary embodiments of the invention may correlate theshift in energy of the C1s peak, as measured by x-ray photoelectronspectroscopy, with a shift in the Fermi level, ΔE_(f), of the samples asa function of doping. This enables the correlation of ΔA/A₀ (S₁₁) withΔE_(f) (see FIG. 9(g) discussed below), and subsequent comparison of theexperimentally measured Seebeck values with those predicted by DFTcalculations discussed above as a function of a shift in the Fermi level(see FIG. 12(e) discussed below).

In this example, the thermopower (Seebeck) measurements were performedon a system that uses copper (Cu) blocks for temperature control andmaking electrical contact to the film. Indium pads were first pressedonto the s-SWCNT films to ensure good Ohmic and thermal contact to theCu blocks. The spacing between the Cu blocks was 4 mm, so the minimumpossible spacing between the indium pads was approximately 6 mm.However, the typical spacing between the indium pads (for greater than90% of the measurements) employed in this example is approximately 16-20mm. Resistive heaters connected to each of the blocks produced thetemperature gradient, which was measured by a differential thermocouple.At least four different temperature gradients (between −3 and +3 K) weremeasured for each sample, with the slope of the best-fit line for thesepoints being used for the reported thermopower α, corrected for thecontributions of all other components of the electrical circuit (i.e.,the Seebeck voltage due to the copper/indium contacts). Based on thephysical dimensions of the system, the estimated error in thethermopower α reported by the system was less than 10%.

While it is difficult to directly correlate ΔA/A₀ (S₁₁) with the actualcarrier density within the s-SWCNT film for a broad range of injectedcarrier densities, the carrier density may be estimated within a fullydoped film based on the approximate size of the exciton. To fully bleachthe S₁₁ exciton, the carrier density (per unit length of SWCNT) will besuch that there is approximately one hole per unit length L_(cor), whereL_(cor) is the correlation length or exciton size. L_(cor) has beendetermined to be in the range of approximately 2 nm, so full S₁₁bleaching occurs for hole densities in the range of approximately 0.5nm⁻¹. The absorbance cross section of (7,5) SWCNTs has been estimatedexperimentally to be in the range of approximately 1.6×10¹⁷ cm²/C atom,and the number of atoms per nanometer of SWCNT can be determinedgeometrically to be [119.7×d_((n,m))], where d_((n,m)) is the diameterof the carbon nanotube with an (n,m) chiral index. Using the absorbancecoefficient of the films and a full-packed SWCNT density (for (7,5)SWCNTs) of approximately 1.12 g/cm³, the films can be estimated to havea density of approximately 0.42 g/cm³ (approximately 40% fillingfraction). Since (7,5) SWCNTs have approximately 99 C atoms/nm, thisdensity translates to a carrier density of approximately 1×10²⁰holes/cm³ for a fully doped s-SWCNT thin film.

Multiple control experiments demonstrate that the remainingfluorene-based polymer or co-polymer in the s-SWCNT networks does notcontribute to the measured electrical conductivity σ. A comparison wasperformed of the basic charge transport properties of polymer-wrapped LVs-SWCNT films with the transport properties of LV SWCNT films preparedwithout fluorene-based polymers or co-polymers. To prepare SWCNT filmsaccording to exemplary embodiments of the invention, SWCNTs that aredispersed with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in aqueous suspension mayfirst be spray-coat mixed (1/3 metallic, 2/3 semiconducting). The CMCmay then be digested from the film with nitric acid, leaving awell-connected network of heavily p-type SWCNTs devoid of residualpolymer. The typically reported figures of merit are plotted for thesetransparent SWCNT films, the optical transmittance at 550 nm (T550) andsheet resistance (R_(sh) in Ω/sq.) in FIG. 6. In this example, the sheetresistance of the polymer:s-SWCNT networks was measured using afour-point probe (1 mm probe spacing). The accuracy of the measurementwas determined using a calibrated indium-doped tin oxide sample with asheet resistance of approximately 14 Ω/sq. The sheet resistance wasconverted to electrical conductivity σ (in S m⁻¹) by utilizing the filmthickness as measured by AFM.

FIG. 6 shows a comparison of the optoelectronic properties of dopedpolymer:LV s-SWCNT networks with doped pristine SWCNT networks. Thesheet resistance versus transmittance (measured at λ, =550 nm) for avariety of doped SWCNT films is provided. The circles and squaresrepresent films sprayed from aqueous dispersions utilizing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) as a dispersant. Following deposition, the CMC may becompletely digested by nitric acid. Black circles are measurements onp-type doped films taken immediately after this nitric acid soak andgrey squares are for films that are subsequently doped n-type withhydrazine. Upright and inverted triangles are for films prepared fromeither PFH-A or PFO-BPy dispersions, respectively. Following ultrasonicspray deposition, the films may be soaked in toluene to remove excesspolymer and then doped strongly p-type by immersing the films in greaterthan 2 mg/ml OA in dichloroethane (DCE) at 78° C.

The T550/R_(sh) values for heavily doped LV s-SWCNT networks employingboth PFH-A and PFO-BPy polymers follow the same trend as the p-typefilms prepared according to the CMC process. This correlation suggeststhat the fluorene-based polymer or co-polymer does not enhance holetransport within the p-type s-SWCNT films. The temperature-dependentresistance of heavily doped polymer-wrapped LV s-SWCNT films was alsocompared to that of SWCNT films prepared without fluorene-based polymeror co-polymer (not shown). In all cases, the resistance decreases withincreasing temperature, indicating a thermally activated conductionmechanism that was previously ascribed to barriers associated withtube-tube junctions. Taken together, these experiments help to confirmthat the electrical properties measured in FIGS. 12(a)-12(f) (discussedbelow) are not appreciably enhanced by the fluorene-based polymer orco-polymer, and instead result from the intrinsic properties of thes-SWCNTs in the film, namely the SWCNT electronic structure,dopant-controlled Fermi level, and inter-tube potential barriers.

At very high doping densities of the polymer:s-SWCNT networks there isalso a decrease in the intensity of the lowest energy absorption bandattributed to the polymer, and the appearance of a red-shifted shoulderin the absorption spectrum. FIGS. 7(a)-7(d) show that these observationscan be attributed to p-type doping of the polymer, since co-dissolvingthe OA dopant into a DCE solution of the polymer (both for PFH-A andPFO-BPy) gives rise to the same spectral features. FIGS. 7(a)-7(d) showa comparison of absorbance spectra for undoped and heavily dopedpolymer:LV networks and polymers in DCE solution. FIG. 7(a) shows PFH-Ain DCE and PFH-A:LV films, while FIG. 7(b) shows PFO-BPy in DCE andPFO-BPy:LV films. Both the polymer:LV films and the solution-phasepolymer are doped heavily by OA. The arrows point to the dominant PFH-Apolaron peak that can be seen in the region of the S33 SWCNT transitionsin the doped s-SWCNT film. FIG. 7(c) shows a comparison of undoped anddoped PFO-BPy films. FIG. 7(d) shows the absorbance of doped PFO-BPyfilms of varying thickness. The legend indicates that the transportproperties for all samples are unmeasurable.

These control experiments were carried out in the solution phase toavoid complications arising from spectral features due to interchaininteractions in the solid state. FIG. 7(c) shows that similar resultsare observed for heavily doped neat PFO-BPy films when the polymer formsa predominantly amorphous solid-state structure. FIG. 7(d) indicatesthat the observed spectral features for heavily doped films areindependent of the PFO-BPy film thickness, spanning thicknesses similarto the polymer:s-SWCNT networks. However, the neat PFO-BPy films havesignificantly more polymer than the polymer:s-SWCNT networks (e.g.,10-20 times for the 130 nm thick PFO-BPy film), since the polymer chainsare densely packed. All attempts to measure the electrical conductivityσ of these doped PFO-BPy films were unsuccessful, even for the thickestfilm that would be expected to have the lowest sheet resistance.

To rationalize the doping behavior of the fluorene-based polymers orco-polymers, the valence level offsets between a model system areconsidered: PFO and the (7,5) s-SWCNT. Schuettfort, T., Nish, A. &Nicholas, R. J. Observation of a Type II Heterojunction in a HighlyOrdered Polymer-Carbon Nanotube Nanohybrid Structure. Nano Lett. 9,3871-3876 (2009) estimated the valence level offset to be approximately500 meV for the (7,5) SWCNT. From Bindl, D. J. et al. Free CarrierGeneration and Recombination in Polymer-Wrapped Semiconducting CarbonNanotube Films and Heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3550-3559(2013), the (9,7) ionization potential has been estimated to be in therange of 5.18 eV. Taking into account the difference in electronic bandgaps of the (9,7) and (7,5) SWCNTs, this places the ionization potentialof the (7,5) SWCNT in the range of approximately 5.36 eV. Janietz, S. etal. Electrochemical determination of the ionization potential andelectron affinity of poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene). Appl. Phys. Lett. 73,2453-2455 (1998) finds an ionization potential of approximately 5.8 eVfor PFO. This translates to an estimated offset of approximately 440 meVbetween the (7,5) SWCNTs and PFO. This offset would grow toapproximately 600 meV for the LV SWCNTs in this example.

This implies that the polymer is not significantly doped (i.e., exhibitsnegligible absorption features due to polaron formation) until fairlylarge shifts occur in the Fermi level (ΔE_(F)>approximately 500 meV).This doping of the polymer can be observed in two ways. Firstly, theabsorbance spectra shows that the fluorene-based polymers are doped byOA at high surface concentrations of OA, i.e. the highest doping levelsas shown in FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b) discussed below, and FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b)discussed below. This is evidenced by a reduction in the oscillatorstrength of the polymer absorption in the range of 400 nm and the growthof new features at longer wavelengths that correspond to the positivepolaron absorption of the hole-doped polymers.

The doping of the polymer can also be seen by a sudden change in theFWHM in the XPS C1s peak. In one example, core-level and work functionXPS measurements were performed. The XPS core-level peaks werecalibrated using a cleaned gold (Au) standard, which includes measuringthe Fermi level and core-levels of Au. The core-level spectra werecollected with a pass energy of 11.85 eV and a step size of 0.10 eV.This gives an uncertainty in the peak position of ±0.05 eV. The workfunction was determined by analyzing the secondary-electron cutoffregion of the spectrum. Since this is a photon-energy independentmeasurement, the secondary-electron spectra were calibrated usingultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy of Au, which captures both theFermi-edge and secondary-electron cutoff region in one calibration scan.These measurements were taken with a pass energy of 2.95 eV and a stepsize of 0.025 eV. This gives an uncertainty in the work function of±0.025 eV. The XPS measurements were performed under ultra-high vacuum(UHV) conditions (10⁻¹⁰ Torr). The samples did not exhibit signs ofX-ray damage or sample charging during the XPS measurements (each samplewas under vacuum for less than 30 mins).

FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b) show XPS of undoped and heavily doped PFO:(7,5)s-SWCNT networks and PFO films. FIG. 8(a) shows XPS of intrinsic andheavily OA-doped PFO or PFO/(7,5). The PFO spectra demonstrate that theC1s spectrum of the PFO/(7,5) sample has a small contribution to the PFOC1s peak, and that at high doping, the PFO peak is shifted by the sameamount as the SWCNT peak (approximately 0.6 eV), although the signalwithin the PFO/SWCNT film is dominated by the s-SWCNTs. Since coreelectron energies in the XPS measurement are referenced to the energy ofthe Fermi level (EF), this large red shift in C 1s energy (EC1s) resultsdirectly from a shift of EF (ΔEF) towards the valence band (p-typedoping). Interestingly, a similar energetic shift is found for the ClXPS peaks with increasing Cl:C ratio, but with an opposite sign to theshift observed for the C 1s spectrum. In contrast, no shift occurs forthe Sb XPS peaks. These observations suggest that the primary chargetransfer complex formed in the OA doping process involves a complexbetween the SWCNT sidewall and Cl atoms.

Note that the FWHM of the fully doped SWCNT/PFO film in FIG. 8(a) isbroader than that of the undoped film. FIG. 8(b) shows the dependence ofthe C1ls FWHM as a function of the shift in Fermi level. Note that theFWHM is roughly constant at approximately 0.85 eV until it abruptlyincreases once the Fermi level is shifted by greater than approximately500 meV. This Fermi level shift is in line with the valence level offsetof approximately 440-500 meV estimated above for the (7,5)/PFO HOMOlevels.

As discussed above, exemplary embodiments of the invention control thecarrier density and Fermi energy of s-SWCNT films. Exemplary embodimentsof the invention may perform p-type doping of polymer:s-SWCNT networksby immersing networks in a solution of OA in DCE, modifying a proceduredescribed in Chandra, B., Afzali, A., Khare, N., El-Ashry, M. M. &Tulevski, G. S. Stable Charge-Transfer Doping of TransparentSingle-Walled Carbon Nanotube Films. Chem. Mater. 22, 5179-5183 (2010),the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. Theprocedure described in Chandra attempts to achieve a maximum (orsaturated) doping level. In contrast, exemplary embodiments of thepresent invention provide control over the doping level within thes-SWCNT network. For example, as discussed below, the desired dopinglevel may be chosen to optimize the TE power factor α²σ of the s-SWCNTnetwork.

In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, the doping level of thes-SWCNT network may be controlled by first saturating the doping levelof the s-SWCNT network, such that the s-SWCNT network is fully doped,and then removing charge carriers from the s-SWCNT network to reach thedesired doping level. For example, the saturating may include a singlestep of immersing the s-SWCNT network in a concentrated OA solution atapproximately 78° C. for at least approximately 1 minute. The OAsolution may have a concentration greater than approximately 1 mg/mL,and the solvent may be DCE or any other appropriate solvent.Alternatively, the saturating may include a plurality of steps ofimmersing the s-SWCNT network in OA solutions having various immersiontimes, concentrations, and/or temperatures. In general, concentrationsof OA above approximately 1 mg/mL lead to very heavy doping, essentiallyfully quenching the S₁₁ SWCNT optical transition, and partial to fullquenching of the S₂₂ and polymer optical transitions, as shown in FIGS.7(a)-7(c). After full doping has been reached, the doping level is thendecreased (i.e., the s-SWCNT network is de-doped) by removing part ofthe OA from the s-SWCNT network. This may be accomplished by immersingthe s-SWCNT network in a suitable solvent, such as acetone or DCE, andmay include a single step or a plurality of steps having variousimmersion times, concentrations, and/or temperatures. For example, fullydoped films may be incrementally de-doped by submersion in acetone from1 second to 20 minutes at temperatures of 25° C. or 56° C. To reach verylow doping levels, the acetone may be exchanged every 5 minutes duringthe hot acetone bath.

For example, for the Solid SPR sample discussed below, full doping isachieved by immersion in a 3 mg/mL solution of OA in DCE at 78° C. for10 minutes, affording a TE power factor of ˜150 μW m⁻¹ K⁻². A peak TEpower factor of approximately 340-350 μW m⁻¹ K⁻² is then achieved byimmersion of the fully doped sample in acetone at room temperature forbetween 1 and 3 minutes.

In another exemplary embodiment of the invention, the doping level maybe controlled by adding the dopant until the desired doping level isreached. This may be performed in one or more steps. For example, theadding of the dopant may include a single step of immersing the s-SWCNTnetwork in an OA solution until the desired doping level is reached, ora plurality of steps of immersing the s-SWCNT network in OA solutionshaving increasing concentrations until the desired doping level isreached. Concentrations of OA as low as approximately 1-5 ng/mL may beused to achieve very low doping levels. For example, a peak TE powerfactor of approximately 100 μW m⁻¹ K⁻² can be obtained for a PFH-A:LVs-SWCNT network by immersion of the undoped film in a solution of OA atconcentrations between 1 and 8.4 pg/mL in DCE at 78° C. for 10 minutes.After the desired doping level has been achieved, the film may beimmersed for no more than approximately 3 seconds in acetone in order toremove excess OA and byproducts. FIG. 9(a) shows absorbance spectra ofPFO:SG65 (7,5) s-SWCNT) thin-film networks as a function of p-typedoping with OA, and FIG. 9(b) shows absorbance spectra of PFH-A:LVs-SWCNT thin-film networks as a function of p-type doping with OA. Thelegends within FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b) identify the concentration of the OAsolution used to achieve the observed bleaching level. An increase inhole density on the s-SWCNTs initially results in a bleach of the firstexciton (S₁₁) absorption transition, followed by bleaching of the secondexciton (S₂₂) absorption transition at higher carrier concentrations.The PF polymers are not appreciably doped until very high surfaceconcentrations of OA, as shown by the bleach of the singlet absorptionpeaks in FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b), and new polaron absorbance features atvery high OA concentrations as shown in FIGS. 3(a)-3(d). As shown inFIGS. 9(c)-9(g), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements of thesystematically doped s-SWCNT networks were used to track the chemicalchanges associated with p-type OA doping. FIG. 9(c) shows XPS at theantimony (Sb) and chlorine (Cl) regions of an undoped (intrinsic, solidlines) and heavily p-type doped (dashed lines) PFO:SG65 (7,5) s-SWCNTnetworks. The inset of FIG. 9(c) shows the chemical structure of the OAdopant. FIG. 9(d) shows XPS at the carbon is (C1s) region for the samePFO:SG65 (7,5) s-SWCNT networks shown in FIG. 9(c). FIG. 9(e) shows theE_(C1s) peak position for the same PFO:SG65 (7,5) s-SWCNT networks shownin FIG. 9(c). FIG. 9(f) shows Sb:C and Cl:C ratios measured by x-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy as a function of the normalized bleach of thepolymer:(7,5) s-SWCNT S₁₁ absorption transition. FIG. 9(g) shows therelationship between the Fermi level shift (ΔE_(f)) and the normalizedbleach of the S₁₁ absorption transitions for PFO:SG65 (7,5) s-SWCNT(circles) and neat LV SWCNT (squares) networks as a function of p-typedoping with OA. The solid line in FIG. 9(g) is an empirical power lawfunction used to determine the Fermi-level shift from the normalizedbleach of the S₁₁ absorption. Surface-bound OA produces strong Sb and Clsignals, as shown in FIG. 9(c), and the amount of surface-bound Sb andCl increases for a film of SWCNTs progressively doped with increasingamounts of OA, as shown in FIG. 9(e). In FIG. 9(f), the Sb:C and Cl:Cratios are compared to the bleach of the S₁₁ exciton absorptiontransition, calculated based on the fractional change in area (ΔA/A₀)for the S₁₁ transition due to doping, for example, from the data shownin FIGS. 9(a) and 9(b). The direct correlation of Sb and Cl signals withΔA/A₀ confirms that the doping level and thus ultimately the Fermi levelcan be controlled sensitively by the amount of adsorbed OA dopant, asdiscussed in further detail below. XPS measurements can also be used totrack the chemical potential of charge carriers injected by the OAdopants. FIG. 9(e) demonstrates an approximately 0.6 eV shift of the C1s spectrum to lower energy for the heavily OA-doped (7,5) film. Acontrol experiment measuring the C 1s spectrum of undoped and heavilydoped PFO, as shown in FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b), indicates that the polymercore levels are also shifted by approximately 0.6 eV, although thesignal within the PFO/SWCNT film is dominated by the s-SWCNTs. Sincecore electron energies in the XPS measurement are referenced to theFermi level, this large red shift in C 1s energy (E_(C1s)) resultsdirectly from a shift of EF (ΔEF) towards the valence band (p-typedoping). FIGS. 9(e) and 9(f) demonstrate that E_(C1s) is inverselycorrelated with the Sb:C and Cl:C ratios, showing that E_(F) iscontrolled entirely by the amount of adsorbed OA.

Correlation of XPS and absorbance data for a series of controllablydoped films allows calibration of the Fermi level shift (ΔE_(F)) as afunction of the relative bleach of the S₁₁ absorption transition. Here,ΔE_(F) is calculated according to the shift in E_(C1s) between theundoped and doped s-SWCNT networks, i.e.,ΔE_(F)=E_(C1s,undoped)−E_(C1s,doped), and ΔA/A₀ (S₁₁) is calculated asdescribed above. The data in FIG. 9(g) are best fit by a power law,which qualitatively matches the dependence obtained by integrating theDOS with respect to energy. FIG. 10 shows the integrated DOS for asemiconducting carbon nanotube. The integration (long-dashed line withopen circles) of the DOS (short-dashed line with open squares) for the(10,8) s-SWCNT is in between the first and second van Hovesingularities. The solid line shows a power law fit. The power law fitshown in FIG. 9(g) and FIG. 10 allows for calibration of changes inthermopower α, electrical conductivity σ, and TE power factor α²σ withchanges in Fermi energy through the easily measured bleach of the S₁₁transition for a series of films doped with fine-tuned carrier densitiesvia OA adsorption.

FIG. 11 shows the ratio of chlorine to antimony (Cl:Sb) in dopedPFO:SG65 (7,5) s-SWCNT networks. The Cl:Sb ratio was measured by x-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy as a function of the normalized bleach of thepolymer:(7,5) s-SWCNT S₁₁ absorption transition. As shown in FIG. 9(e),the antimony:carbon (Sb:C) and chlorine:carbon (Cl:C) ratios bothexhibit the same dependence on the relative bleach of the S₁₁ absorptionband, ΔA/A₀ (S₁₁), i.e., the extent of doping. However, FIG. 11 showsthat the Cl:Sb ratio is always significantly lower than that expectedfor the [SbCl₆]⁻ anion and is typically in the range of approximately0.6-0.95. This contrasts with the supposition of initial studies on OAdoping of SWCNTs that suggested the formation of a charge-transfercomplex between the oxidized SWCNT and the intact hexachloroantimonate[SbCl₆]⁻ anion. This suggests that the [SbCl₆]⁻ anion undergoes asignificant amount of decomposition as a result of interacting with theSWCNT sidewall in the doping process.

FIGS. 12(a)-12(f) show TE properties of various polyfluorene/s-SWCNTthin films prepared according to exemplary embodiments of the invention.FIG. 12(a) shows the dependence of the theoretically predicted peakthermopower α (dashed line) and maximum experimentally measuredelectrical conductivity σ (solid line) on the s-SWCNT electronicbandgap. The vertical error bars are derived from the standard deviationof the measured sheet resistances and film thicknesses. The horizontalerror bars denote the standard deviation of the electronic band gapderived from the s-SWCNT diameter distribution. FIG. 12(b) shows acomparison of the predicted (line) and experimentally measured (symbols)maximum TE power factor α²σ as a function of the s-SWCNT electronicbandgap. The vertical error bars are derived from the standard deviationof the measured sheet resistances, thermopowers, and film thicknesses.The horizontal error bars denote the standard deviation of theelectronic band gap derived from the s-SWCNT diameter distribution.

FIG. 12(c) shows the thermopower α as a function of the electricalconductivity σ for PFO:SG65 (7,5) (hexagons), PFH-A:HiPCO (squares anddiamonds), PFH-A:LV (upright triangles), PFO-BPy:LV (invertedtriangles), and PFO-BPy:Tuball (circles). FIG. 12(d) shows the TE powerfactor α²σ as a function of electrical conductivity a for PFO:SG65 (7,5)(hexagons), PFH-A:HiPCO (squares and diamonds), PFH-A:LV (uprighttriangles), PFO-BPy:LV (inverted triangles), and PFO-BPy:Tuball(circles). The legend in FIG. 12(c) also identifies the polymer:s-SWCNTnetworks in FIG. 12(d).

FIG. 12(e) shows a comparison of theoretical (line) and experimental(symbols) dependence of the thermopower α on the position of the Fermienergy for LV s-SWCNTs. The theoretically predicted electronic DOS isshown for reference.

FIG. 12(f) shows the thermal conductivity κ of an PFO-BPy:LV thin filmas a function of the electrical conductivity σ near 300 K. In thisexample, the doped sample was measured two separate times to demonstratereproducibility and subsequently re-measured after de-doping undervacuum. The error bars, which in the case of the doped film aretypically smaller than the symbol, arise nearly entirely from the errorin the thickness determined by AFM. An estimation of the maximumelectronic contribution to the thermal conductivity κ using theempirical Wiedemann-Franz law, with the Sommerfeld value for the Lorenznumber, L₀, is given by the solid line.

As an initial guide for TE power factor studies, FIG. 12(a) plots theband gap dependence for both the experimentally measured maximumelectrical conductivity σ (i.e. heavily doped) and the maximumcalculated thermopower α (i.e. low doping). The electronic bandgap(E_(g,elec)) utilized in FIG. 12(a) is the sum of the optical bandgap(E_(g,opt)) and the exciton binding energy (E_(b,ε)), where E_(b,ε) iscalculated according to Capaz, R. B., Spataru, C. D., Ismail-Beigi, S. &Louie, S. G. Excitons in carbon nanotubes: Diameter and chiralitytrends. Physica Status Solidi (b) 244, 4016-4020 (2007), the entiredisclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, assuming asurrounding dielectric constant of ε=4.

In this example, the electronic band gap (E_(g,elec)) was determined bythe addition of the optical band gap (E_(g,opt)) and the exciton bindingenergy (E_(b)), assuming a dielectric constant ε=4: i.e.,E_(g,elec)=E_(g,opt)+E_(b), ε=4. The binding energies of the S₁₁excitons are described by the analytical function:

$\begin{matrix}{E_{b} = {\frac{1}{d}\left( {A + \frac{B}{d} + {C\xi} + {D\xi^{2}}} \right)}} & (6)\end{matrix}$

where d is the SWCNT diameter in nm and ξ=(−1)^(ν).cos(3θ/d), whereν=(n−m) mod 3. Accordingly, for SWCNTs in vacuum (ε=1.846), A=0.6724 eVnm, B=−4.910×10² eV nm², C=4.577×10⁻² eV nm², and D=−8.325×10⁻³ eV nm³.To re-calculate the binding energy for SWCNTs in a medium with a givendielectric constant, the scaling law (E_(b)∝ε^(−1.4)) applies. For thecalculations above, the diameter of each SWCNT is taken from Weisman, R.& Bachilo, S. Dependence of optical transition energies on structure forsingle-walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous suspension: An empiricalKataura plot. Nano Lett. 3, 1235-1238 (2003), the entire disclosure ofwhich is incorporated by reference herein, and the optical gap may betaken either from the same document or from photoluminescence excitationmaps on SWCNT dispersions.

Table 1 below shows the calculated binding energies (E_(b)) andOptical/Electronic Band Gaps (E_(g)) for various SWCNTs considered,either experimentally or theoretically.

TABLE 1 d E_(b, ε=1.846) E_(b, ε=4) E_(g, opt) E_(g, elec) SWCNT (nm)(eV) (eV) (eV) (ε = 4) (eV)  (7, 5) 0.829 0.78 0.26 1.21 1.47 (10, 8)1.24 0.53 0.18 0.84 1.02 (10, 0) 0.794 0.70 0.24 1.07 1.31 (11, 0) 0.8930.73 0.25 1.20 1.44 (13, 0) 1.032 0.55 0.19 0.90 1.08 (14, 0) 1.111 0.600.20 0.96 1.16 (16, 0) 1.27 0.46 0.15 0.76 0.92 (17, 0) 1.35 0.50 0.170.80 0.97 (19, 0) 1.508 0.39 0.13 0.66 0.80 (20, 0) 1.588 0.43 0.14 0.690.83 (22, 0) 1.747 0.34 0.11 0.59 0.70  (7, 6) 0.895 0.72 0.24 1.11 1.35 (8, 6) 0.986 0.63 0.21 1.06 1.27  (8, 7) 1.032 0.57 0.19 0.98 1.18  (9,7) 1.103 0.58 0.20 0.94 1.14 (11, 9) 1.377 0.46 0.16 0.77 0.92

FIG. 12(a) demonstrates that the film electrical conductivity σdecreases as a function of E_(g,elec) (empirically fit with a sigmoidfunction). In contrast, the DFT-calculated thermopower α increaseslinearly with increasing E_(g,elec). In FIG. 12(b), the expected bandgap dependence of the TE power factor α²σ is calculated, using themaximum α (calculated) and σ (empirical) from FIG. 12(a). Thisempirically predictive estimation makes the assumption that thethermopower α at maximum TE power factor α²σ (i.e. moderate doping)scales similarly for all s-SWCNTs as a function of electricalconductivity σ, an assumption that is tested by the careful control ofthe doping level, as discussed in further detail below. FIG. 12(b)suggests a distinct bandgap diameter (d) dependence for the TE powerfactor α²σ of s-SWCNT films, with a maximum TE power factor α²σoccurring for (E_(g,elec)) of approximately 1.1-1.2 eV ((d) ofapproximately 1-1.1 nm).

FIG. 12(c) displays the measured thermopower α as a function of theelectrical conductivity σ for five representative PF-wrapped s-SWCNTsamples. As shown in FIG. 12(c), the thermopower α decreases withincreasing electrical conductivity σ. However, the thermopower α at lowdoping is extraordinarily high. All samples, except for thePFO-BPy:Tuball networks, achieve a thermopower α of at least 200 μV K⁻¹at low doping, whereas several samples have values approaching or above1,000 μV K⁻¹. Furthermore, the thermopower α decays rather slowly withincreasing electrical conductivity σ, decreasing less than an order ofmagnitude over three to four decades of electrical conductivity σ,similar to the trends observed for semiconducting polymers such aspolythiophenes. As a result, the TE power factor α²σ steadily rises withincreasing electrical conductivity σ, reaching values above 100 μW m⁻¹K⁻² at electrical conductivity σ values above approximately 10,000 Sm⁻¹, as shown in FIG. 4(d). The TE power factor α²σ of the HiPCOnetworks reaches a value of approximately 340 μW m⁻¹ K⁻², which is thehighest TE power factor α²σ (by a factor of approximately 3.4) everreported for a SWCNT network. The TE power factor α²σ observed for theHiPCO sample is comparable to the best values obtained forhigh-performance Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT)-based polymerTE materials. The experimental trend for the maximum TE power factor α²σobtained for each representative diameter (band gap) distribution, asshown by the symbols in FIG. 12(b), matches the predicted trend shown bythe line in FIG. 12(b) rather well.

The measured thermopower α shown in FIG. 12(c) are roughly in the rangepredicted by the first-principles calculations for s-SWCNTs, suggestingthat the large a values are determined, at least in part, by theelectronic structure of the s-SWCNTs. Recent studies have attributedsomewhat large (but significantly lower than observed here) values ofthe thermopower α primarily to the contribution of tube-tube junctions.These studies assume a low to moderate value for the inherentthermopower α of isolated s-SWCNTs that is enhanced by the thermalresistance of tube-tube junctions within the film. The much higher(predicted and observed) values for α according to exemplary embodimentsof the invention suggest that it may be important to consider theinherently large thermopower α imparted to s-SWCNTs as a result of theirintrinsic electronic structure.

To explicitly compare the experimentally obtained thermopower α to thefirst-principles calculations, the calibration curve generated in FIG.9(g) is utilized to convert ΔA/A₀ for the progressively doped s-SWCNTfilms to ΔE_(F). FIG. 12(e) compares the empirical thermopower α of thetwo LV s-SWCNT networks to that predicted for the (10,8) s-SWCNT (arepresentative predominant species within the LV distribution), as afunction of the Fermi level position. It is first interesting to notethat the magnitude of a for the PFO-BPy sample at low doping iscommensurate with that predicted by first principles. Additionally,although the experimentally observed thermopower α decays withincreasing Fermi level shift, the decay is much slower thantheoretically predicted. In particular, the experimental trend does notdecay to zero in the range of −0.75 V≤ΔE_(F)≤−0.45 V but is instead inthe range of approximately 70-150 μV K⁻¹ in this range. The slow decaymay result, at least in part, from the contribution of tube-tubejunctions to the thermopower α.

In order to evaluate the TE performance beyond the TE power factor α²σ,the in-plane thermal conductance of an LV s-SWCNT:polymer networkdeposited onto a micro-machined silicon nitride (Si—N) platform wasmeasured. These structures, formed from patterned 500 nm thicklow-stress Si—N, consisted of two islands connected by an approximately90 micron wide, approximately 2 mm long Si—N beam that forms the samplegrowth stage. Note the lateral dimension (over which the temperaturegradient is established) is enormous compared to the sample filmthickness, ensuring the experiment is sensitive only to in-plane heatflow. Each island contains a heater, a thermistor, and electrical leadsformed from patterned Cr/Pt (thickness 10 nm/40 nm). This allowsaccurate control and measurement of thermal gradients on the thin films.

In one example, a micromachined suspended Si—N thermal isolationplatform measurement technique shown in FIGS. 13(a)-13(d) was employedto measure the raw thermal conductance data shown in FIG. 14(a), whichwas subsequently used to calculate the thermal conductivity κ datapresented in FIG. 14(b) and FIG. 12(f). FIG. 13(a) shows an opticalimage of the Si—N platform. FIG. 13(b) shows an optical image of theshadow mask used to spray deposit the s-SWCNT network onto the Si—N beambetween the islands on the platform. FIG. 13(c) shows an optical imageof the Si—N beam, viewed through the shadow mask shown in FIG. 13(b).FIG. 13(d) shows an optical image of the s-SWCNT network afterultrasonic spray deposition through the shadow mask, showing that thenetwork extends over the entire length of the Si—N beam and onto thetriangular electrical leads on the two islands. This data measured thecombined thermal conductance of the Si—N beam and s-SWCNT network, whichwas then corrected for the contribution of the bare Si—N beam andconverted to thermal conductivity κ using the dimensions of thedeposited s-SWCNT network. The data shown in FIGS. 14(a)-14(d) indicatethat the thermal conductance of the undoped PFO-BPy:LV s-SWCNT network(circles) is actually decreased upon doping (diamonds, squares, andinverted triangles).

Before sample deposition, a protective 10 nm layer of amorphous Al₂O₃was deposited on the platforms through a shadow mask that leaves thesample electrical leads exposed. The platform was then exposed to OAunder the same conditions as occur in the doping step. This step canleave dopant molecules attached to the Si—N and can cause small(approximately 10 nW K⁻¹) reductions in the background Si—N thermalconductance due to phonon scattering. The background thermal conductanceof the platform was then measured by recording the island temperaturesas a function of applied power and employing a simple 2-body thermalmodel. After this measurement, the film was ultrasonically sprayedthrough another shadow mask (see FIG. 13(b)), and the platformconductance measurement was repeated. The Si—N beam can be observedthrough the mask in FIG. 13(c), and with a SWCNT film deposited onto itand the triangular electrical leads in FIG. 13(d). The backgroundconductance was subtracted from this second measurement to give thethermal conductance contribution of the film. This was converted tothermal conductivity κ via the sample geometry, including the thicknessdetermined by AFM. The platform was then immersed in OA and theconductance measurement performed again to test the sample in the dopedstate followed by deliberate de-doping to achieve a s-SWCNT network withan intermediate electrical conductivity σ (see FIGS. 14(a)-14(d)).

FIGS. 14(a)-14(d) show the temperature-dependent TE properties ofundoped and doped PFO-BPy:LV s-SWCNT networks. FIGS. 14(a)-14(d) showthe thermal conductance, the thermal conductivity κ, the electricalconductivity σ, and the thermopower α, respectively, as functions oftemperature T. Background measurements were carried out between 250 and325 K for the suspended Si—N sample platform before film deposition(dashed line). Initial measurements were carried out between 285 and 315K after deposition of the PFO-BPy:LV s-SWCNT network (circles), andafter doping (two subsequent measurements, squares and invertedtriangles, separated by a waiting period in vacuum that slightlyde-doped the film). After an extended de-doping period, the sample wasre-measured over an extended temperature range of 250 to 350 K(diamonds).

The undoped network adds a large contribution to the total thermalconductance relative to the conductance of the bare Si—N beam. FIG.12(f) shows the extracted thermal conductivity κ data near roomtemperature for a PFO-BPy:LV network that is either undoped or doped.The OA dopant, while clearly adding holes to produce a large electricalconductivity σ of approximately 110,000 S m⁻¹, causes a significant dropin the total thermal conductance relative to the undoped network. Beforedoping, κ is fairly large at approximately 16.5 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹, as shown inFIG. 12(f), though certainly still a small fraction of the very large κseen in isolated SWCNTs. Since this s-SWCNT film is intrinsic (withimmeasurable electrical conductivity σ), the thermal conductivity κ isentirely due to phonons. After doping, the much lower κ (approximately4.5 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹) is still significantly larger than the estimate of theelectronic contribution from the Wiedemann-Franz law (shown as the solidblack line). Furthermore, the doping dependence of κ appears to becomplex, since κ decreases even further to approximately 2 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹when the same film is intentionally de-doped to an electricalconductivity σ of approximately 17,000 S m⁻¹.

The large drop in κ suggests that the addition of the dopant not onlycontributes holes to the SWCNT-polymer hybrid but also adds scatteringcenters for phonons. This intriguing result provides strong evidencethat the thermal conductivity κ in s-SWCNT networks is dominated byphonons, with a very small electronic contribution, and can besignificantly reduced by appropriate doping strategies, even at veryhigh electrical conductivity σ (e.g. greater than 100,000 S m⁻¹). Asdiscussed above, reducing the thermal conductivity κ may increase thefigure of merit zT. Beyond doping strategies, network morphology andisotope composition may be controlled as rational routes towards furtherreducing the thermal conductivity κ (and increasing zT) by interfacialphonon scattering.

Although the zT values for neat s-SWCNT networks according to exemplaryembodiments of the invention are still low (zT≈0.01-0.05), the weakcorrelation of both the thermopower α and the thermal conductivity κ tothe electrical conductivity σ observed here provides a new framework forunderstanding the role of s-SWCNTs in TE applications. Additionally, zTmay be further improved by optimizing the operational temperature Trange, as illustrated by the temperature dependence of the TE propertiesshown in FIGS. 15(a)-15(c) (also see FIGS. 14(a)-14(d)). FIGS.15(a)-15(c) show the temperature dependence of the thermopower α,electrical conductivity σ, and thermal conductivity κ, respectively, foran approximately 90 nm thick PFO-BPy:LV s-SWCNT network. These data showthat while both the thermopower α and electrical conductivity σ increasewith temperature T, the thermal conductivity κ stays fairly constant,resulting in an enhanced zT at elevated temperature T. The error barsfor the thermopower α are determined from the uncertainties in theSeebeck voltage and applied temperature difference and are approximately2% of the absolute thermopower α. The errors bars for the electricalconductivity σ and thermal conductivity κ take into account theuncertainty in the measured resistivity and thermal conductance,respectively, but are dominated by the approximately 10% uncertainty inthe measured film thickness.

FIGS. 15(a)-15(c) indicate that zT increases as a function oftemperature T, and the zT at 350 K is approximately a factor of 2.5greater than that determined at 300 K. At 350 K, zT is still increasing,and the optimum temperature T may be above 350 K. SWCNTs aresignificantly more stable with respect to elevated temperatures thantypical conducting polymers. Thermogravimetric analysis shows thatSWCNTs (in the absence of metal catalyst nanoparticles) can withstandtemperatures up to 500° C. in air, which is well above the temperaturesmost polymer systems can withstand. This enhanced stability, and theresults in FIGS. 14(a)-14(d) suggest that s-SWCNTs may represent a novelorganic TE component that is viable at elevated temperatures, either ontheir own or within composites.

The thermopower α and TE power factor α²σ as functions of the electricalconductivity σ do not always follow the same trends when a sample isdoped sequentially or de-doped from its fully doped state. FIGS. 16(a)and 16(b) show this “hysteresis” for two PFH-A:HiPCO networks. FIGS.16(a) and 16(b) show the impact of the doping protocol followed to tunethe carrier density on the thermopower α and the TE power factor α²σ,respectively. Interestingly, the peak TE power factor α²σ that can beachieved appears to be independent of the doping protocol. Specifically,FIG. 16(b) shows that the peak TE power factor α²σ is independent of thedirection in which the carrier density is tuned. This has potentialimplications for the fabrication of TE generators composed of dopedcarbon nanotube networks, since it suggests that the path followed toreach the target doping density is unimportant in determining theoptimal performance. Accordingly, as discussed above, the target dopingdensity may be achieved either by adding the charge-carrier dopant tothe s-SWCNT network until the target doping density is reached orsaturating the charge-carrier dopant in the s-SWCNT network and thende-doping the s-SWCNT network until the target doping density isreached.

The methods of preparing an s-SWCNT network discussed above result in apolymer being wrapped around the carbon nanotubes of the s-SWCNTnetwork. However, the TE properties of the s-SWCNT network may befurther improved by removing at least a portion of the wrapped polymer.For example, an H-bonded supramolecular polymer (SP) may be used toselectively disperse s-SWCNTs. After the s-SWCNTs are dispersed by theSP, the SP may be disassembled and removed by disrupting the H-bonds,allowing for the production of samples enriched with s-SWCNTs andcontaining no residual polymer. The SP may be dissolved after thin-filmdeposition. As discussed in further detail below, removal of theH-bonded supramolecular polymer after thin-film deposition results in(1) enhanced carrier doping and electrical conductivity σ, (2) enhancedcharge carrier mobility, and (3) approximately a factor of 2 increase inthe TE power factor α²σ.

Three s-SWCNT network samples were prepared by LV. The first sample was“PFOBPy:LV”, a control sample of LV s-SWCNTs dispersed bypoly[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-co-(6,6′-{2,2′-bipyridine})](PFO-BPy) in which a polymer is wrapped around the carbon nanotubes ofthe s-SWCNT network. The second sample was “Solid SPR,” a sample of LVs-SWCNTs that were dispersed using the H-bonded SP, where the SP wasremoved by treatment with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) after networkdeposition. The third sample was “Solution SPR”, a sample of LV s-SWCNTsthat were dispersed using the H-bonded SP, where the SP was removed bytreatment with TFA in solution prior to network deposition. FIG. 17(a)shows the absorption spectra, normalized to the area under thesecond-exciton (S₂₂) optical transition envelope, for the three s-SWCNTinks used to prepare the s-SWCNT networks. The similarity between thepeak envelopes corresponding to both the first-exciton (S₁₁) and S22optical transitions indicates that PFO-BPy and SP result in similars-SWCNT distributions extracted from the starting LV material, with somesubtle differences in the exact yield of the individual s-SWCNT species.In both cases, the lack of peaks in the 600-850 nm region,characteristic of the M₁₁ optical transitions, suggests that m-SWCNTcontamination is below the optical detection limit (i.e., <1%). As shownin FIGS. 17(b) and 17(c), the similar species distributions areconfirmed by photoluminescence excitation maps, which show emissionpeaks of broadly similar relative intensities, corresponding to s-SWCNTswith similar chiral indices, denoted by the (n,m) indices adjacent tothe circles that identify particular emission peaks. For the samplewhere the H-bonded SP is removed in solution and the s-SWCNTs aresubsequently re-dispersed in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), there issignificant broadening and a discernable bathochromic shift (˜30 nm) ofthe S₁₁ optical transitions. This points toward strong van der Waalsinteractions between individual s-SWCNTs and suggests that nanotubebundles are present even in solution. Note that the peak atapproximately 1,930 nm corresponds to imperfect background subtractionof absorption due to the NMP solvent. The s-SWCNT dispersion in NMP doesnot yield measureable luminescence, despite the low m-SWCNT content of<0.1%, potentially due to inter-tube interactions within bundles and/orexcitonic screening effects induced by the high-dielectric solvent.

FIG. 17(d) shows the absorbance spectra, normalized to the area underthe S₂₂ optical transition envelope, of the s-SWCNT networks prepared byultrasonic spray deposition (and subsequent post-deposition solventtreatment to remove excess PFO-BPy or fully remove SP). In comparison tothe inks, the S₁₁ and S22 optical transition envelopes of the PFO-BPy:LVand Solid SPR samples are broadened, indicating stronger interactionsbetween individual s-SWCNTs, although only a small (-20 nm) bathochromicshift is observed. The s-SWCNT network prepared from the NMP dispersion(Solution SPR) also exhibits broadened optical transition envelopescompared to the corresponding ink, but in this case the transitions alsoexhibit sizeable bathochromic shifts of approximately 20 meV, suggestingthat further bundling occurs during the film deposition or formationsteps. FIG. 17(d) demonstrates that the polymer was successfully removedin the Solid SPR sample, as evidenced by the decrease in optical densityin the polymer absorbance region (400-500 nm).

FIG. 17(e) shows atomic force microscopy (AFM) surface topography imagesof the three s-SWCNT networks. FIG. 17(e) shows that the largest bundles(approximately 43 nm in diameter) are present in the Solution SPRsample, consistent with the large bathochromic shift observed upon filmdeposition. The AFM images of the PFO-BPy:LV and Solid SPR samples donot indicate the presence of individual s-SWCNTs (either polymer-wrappedor bare) but reveal nanotube bundles on the order of 14 nm and 24 nm indiameter, respectively. This suggests that solvent evaporation duringfilm deposition drives s-SWCNT bundle formation. However, retaining theSP during film formation helps to limit the extent of bundling,resulting in substantially smaller bundles than found when the SP isremoved prior to network deposition. As shown in FIG. 17(f), aFourier-transform infrared (FTIR) absorption spectrum of the sampleprepared from the SP:LV dispersion prior to TFA treatment exhibitabsorption bands due to vibrational modes characteristic of the SP, asshown in FIG. 18). Treatment of this film with TFA appears to result incomplete removal of the SP from the LV SWCNT network, since theabsorption peaks are absent from the FTIR spectrum.

The three samples displayed in FIGS. 17(a)-17(f) exhibit largevariations in both the extent of residual polymer within each s-SWCNTnetwork and the resulting network morphology. To probe the effects ofthese changes on carrier transport and TE performance, the s-SWCNTnetworks were doped with OA, where the doping level was controlled bythe methods discussed above. FIGS. 19(a) and 19(b) show the thermopowerα and the TE power factor α²σ versus the electrical conductivity σ,respectively. The dependence of the TE power factor α²σ on theelectrical conductivity σ shown in FIG. 19(b) indicates some effects ofthe polymer in transport and the effects of bundling. First, incomparing the PFO-BPy:LV sample to the Solution SPR sample, a similartrend in the TE power factor α²σ versus the electrical conductivity σemerges, as well as a similar peak TE power factor α²σ (approximately140-150 μW/m·K²). This trend holds until high doping levels, where thetwo datasets deviate. The Solution PR TE power factor α²σ sharplydecreases after the peak, predominantly due to the limited peakelectrical conductivity σ in the s-SWCNT network. This rapid decline canbe attributed to this film's inability to be doped to high levelsefficiently. Second, and most dramatically, the peak TE power factor α³σof approximately 350 μW/m·K² for the Solid SPR film more than doublesthat of the other two films, placing the performance of theapproximately 1.3 nm diameter LV s-SWCNT networks in the same range ashigh-performance semiconducting polymers, such as PEDOT:PSS.

The absorption spectra of the doped s-SWCNT networks shown in FIGS.20(a)-3(c) may be analyzed as a function of OA doping level. Asdiscussed above, the extent to which the exciton transitions arequenched is proportional to the hole density injected into the occupiedelectronic states of the s-SWCNTs, as expected from the phase spacefilling effect for an excitonic semiconductor. This correlation allowsfor the extent of absorption bleaching to serve as a comparative measureof the relative carrier density within each s-SWCNT network at a givenelectrical conductivity σ. This relationship is useful, since a numberof assumptions may be made to correlate the extent of bleachingquantitatively with s-SWCNT carrier density, especially for polydispersesamples with multiple s-SWCNT species.

FIGS. 20(a)-20(c) show the qualitative impact of increasing carrierdensity on the absorbance spectra of the three samples. FIGS.21(a)-21(c) show a more complete series of absorbance spectra, at dopinglevels spanning the entire range of absorption bleaching levels andcorresponding to several orders of magnitude in electrical conductivity,for the three samples shown in FIGS. 20(a)-20(c). As shown in FIGS.21(a)-21(c), in all cases, low doping levels result in bleaching of theS₁₁ envelope, followed by bleaching of the S22 envelope at increasingcarrier densities. When the networks are fully doped, the S₁₁ absorptionenvelope is completely bleached, and the S22 absorption envelope ispartially bleached. As shown in FIG. 20(a), for the PFO-BPy:LV sample,high doping levels result in formation of positive polarons on thePFO-BPy chains, as evidenced by the appearance of a new spectral featureat approximately 400 nm.

FIGS. 20(d)-20(f) show the electrical conductivity σ of the s-SWCNTnetworks as a function of the fractional bleach (ΔA/A₀) of the S₁₁ andS₂₂ absorption envelopes. A₀ corresponds to the integrated area underthe absorption spectra spanning both the S₁₁ and S22 absorptionenvelopes. In this example, the spectral range was chosen to beapproximately 650 nm to approximately 2400 nm. ΔA corresponds to thedoping-induced change in the integrated area over the same spectralrange. As shown in FIG. 20(d), tor the PFO-BPy:LV network, the maximumconductivity σ (approximately 170,000 S/m) occurs when the S₁₁ and S₂₂absorption envelopes are bleached approximately 71%. As shown in FIG.20(e), when the SP is removed after deposition of the s-SWCNT network,the dopant is capable of inducing a larger bleach of the absorptionbands (approximately 78%) and the maximum conductivity σ is doubled toapproximately 340,000 S/m. In contrast, as shown in FIG. 20(f), when theSP is removed in solution prior to network deposition, the maximumconductivity σ only reaches approximately 65,000 S/m and the S₁₁ and S₂₂absorption envelopes are bleached approximately 71%.

The differences observed in FIGS. 20(a)-20(f) may be explained byconsidering the correlation between ΔA/A₀ and the hole density, as wellas the necessity for OA molecules to interact directly with the s-SWCNTπ-electron system to effectively inject this hole density. Since all ofthe samples reach their maximum electrical conductivity σ between 70-80%bleaching of the S₁₁ and S22 absorption envelopes, this suggests thatthe hole densities are fairly similar when the samples are fully doped.However, the slightly larger extent of bleaching for the Solid SPR canbe rationalized if one considers that the charge carrier doping occursby interaction of the dopant molecules with the SWCNT surface. For thePFO-BPy:LV sample, the PFO-BPy polymer partially restricts access of thedopant molecules to the SWCNT surface, whereas the excessive bundlingobserved for the network prepared from the LV dispersion in NMP alsoresults in a significant reduction in the available SWCNT surface area,despite the absence of a wrapping polymer. These two effects result in aslight reduction in the fractional bleaching level when the PFO-BPy:LVand Solution SPR samples reach their maximum doping level.

In all cases, the electrical conductivity data in FIGS. 20(d)-20(f) havetwo regimes: at low doping levels the electrical conductivity σ isweakly dependent on ΔA/A₀, followed by a transition to a region wherethe electrical conductivity σ rapidly increases with ΔA/A₀ up to themaximum electrical conductivity σ at full doping. The electricalconductivity σ is the product of the carrier density n and the mobilityμ according to σ=neμ, where e is the charge on an electron. Since ΔA/A₀is proportional to the carrier density n, the slopes of these tworegimes provide an indication of the charge carrier mobility in thes-SWCNT networks. This is similar to the general methodology forextracting field-effect mobilities from FET transfer curves. In thatcase, the gate voltage is proportional to charge carrier density and themobility is estimated using the slope of the source-drain current versusgate voltage. The Solid SPR sample exhibits the largest slopes (for bothregimes), suggesting that removing the wrapping polymer after networkdeposition reduces the barriers to carrier transport and results in highcarrier mobility. The Solution SPR sample exhibits the smallest slopes,indicating that removal of the wrapping polymer before networkdeposition is not sufficient to maintain a large carrier mobility. Inthis case, the junction resistance between SWCNT bundles has been shownto increase with bundle size, suggesting that any potential mobilityimprovements attained by removing the polymer in the Solution-SPR sampleare negated by the dramatically larger bundle sizes in this sample.These observations suggest that a network consisting of small bundles ofSWCNTs that are free of wrapping polymer is the optimum morphology forhighly-conductive SWCNT films.

The trends shown in FIGS. 20(a)-20(f) provide information regarding thedifferences in the TE properties shown in FIGS. 19(a) and 19(b). Theenhanced performance for the Solid SPR sample arises primarily from twoeffects. First, the electrical conductivity measurements shown in FIGS.20(d)-20(f) demonstrate that residual polymer within these films isessentially an inert filler, although its presence presumably blockscertain areas of tube/bundle surfaces from being directly accessible todopant adsorption. Thus, removing this polymer generates networkscomprised solely of the active s-SWCNT transport phase, and allows forbetter surface accessibility, and hence doping efficiency, of the OAmolecules. Second, removing the polymer in the solid state (afternetwork deposition) appears to increase the charge carrier mobilitywithin the s-SWCNT network, relative to a control sample containingresidual PFO-BPy in a roughly 1:1 mass ratio with the SWCNTs. Third,removing the SP in the solid-state, as opposed to solution-phase removal(before network deposition), enables the retention of small bundle sizein the final network, similar to (but slightly larger than) the bundlesize within the PFOBPy:LV network. The larger bundle size of theSolution SPR networks reduces the mobility, which in turn limits theultimate conductivity σ of these networks. Since the carrierconcentration of the fully doped Solution SPR network is only slightlysmaller than that of the fully doped Solid SPR network, the dramaticallylower maximum conductivity σ of the Solution SPR sample (64,000 S/mversus 340,000 S/m for the Solution SPR sample) is a direct result ofthis reduced mobility. Ultimately, the increased surface area associatedwith the small bundles of the Solid SPR network (relative to theSolution SPR network) and the better accessibility of dopant toSWCNT/bundle surfaces and higher carrier mobility (relative to thePFOBPy:LV network) accounts for the ability of the Solid SPR network toachieve extremely high electrical conductivities a that reachapproximately 340,000 S/m.

Accordingly, improving the charge carrier mobility generates largeimprovements in the attainable TE power factor α²σ. This conclusion canbe understood by considering the dependencies of the conductivity σ andthermopower α on the carrier density n. While the conductivity σ isdirectly proportional to carrier density n, the thermopower α isinversely proportional to the carrier density n:

$\begin{matrix}{\alpha = {\frac{8\pi^{2}k_{B}^{2}}{3eh^{2}}m^{*}{T\left( \frac{\pi}{3n} \right)}^{2/3}}} & (7)\end{matrix}$

where k_(B) is the Boltzmann constant, e is the elementary charge, h isthe Planck constant, m* is the charge carrier effective mass, T is theabsolute temperature, and n is the charge carrier density.

A higher hole mobility implies that a given conductivity σ can bereached at a lower carrier density n. In turn, Equation (7) implies thatat a given conductivity σ, the s-SWCNT thin film with the highest holemobility will also have the highest thermopower α. FIGS. 20(a)-20(f)provide a way to visualize this effect for any series of s-SWCNT thinfilms, and Table 2 summarizes key metrics from this absorption analysisthat can be used to screen the effects of a given change on the expecteds-SWCNT TE performance. The regions between the solid vertical lines inFIGS. 20(d)-20(f) indicate the doping levels at which the maximum TEpower factor α²σ is observed for each sample. The magnitude of themaximum TE power factor α²σ for this series of samples is inverselyproportional to the ΔA/A₀ at which this TE power factor α²σ occurs,implying lower carrier density for better-performing samples. Also, asdiscussed above, the maximum attainable conductivity and the slope ofthe conductivity σ versus ΔA/A₀ both correlate linearly to the maximumTE power factor α²σ. Ultimately, as demonstrated here for the Solid SPRsample, higher carrier mobility essentially shifts the thermopower α vs.conductivity σ curve shown in FIG. 19(a) up and to the right,translating directly to a dramatic increase in the achievable TE powerfactor α²σ.

TABLE 2 Transport Properties of Doped LV s-SWCNT Thin Film NetworksMaximum σ Maximum Transition Slope1 Slope2 Peak α²σ Sample [S/m] ΔA/A₀ΔA/A₀ [S/m] [S/m] [μW/m · K²] PFO-BPy:LV 169,000 0.71 0.48-0.58 64,000521,000 152 Solid SPR 339,000 0.78 0.43-0.53 112,000 787,000 349Solution SPR 69,000 0.71 0.49-0.61 42,000 195,000 139

Accordingly, to achieve a highly conductive s-SWCNT network from apolymer-enriched dispersion, exemplary embodiments of the invention maylimit the level of nanotube bundling in the s-SWCNT network andeliminate as much of the insulating (wrapped) polymer as possible. Theuse of a removable SP for s-SWCNT enrichment, and its subsequentdissolution after thin-film deposition, produce dramatic improvements inthe TE performance of the s-SWCNT networks. These advances push theperformance of the approximately 1.3 nm diameter LV networks into thesame range recently demonstrated for both HiPCO s-SWCNTs (<d>1.1 nm,with residual polyfluorene) and high-performance PEDOT-based organicthermoelectrics. These methods may also be applied to s-SWCNTs withdiameters in the range of 1-1.1 nm, which can produce TE power factorsa²σ of approximately 350 μW/m·K², even at a polymer: SWCNT mass ratio ofapproximately 1:1.

Based on the above, exemplary embodiments of the present inventionprovide methods for determining desired doping conditions for an s-SWCNTnetwork. The method may begin by spray depositing an s-SWCNT film asdiscussed above. The film may be treated to remove excess polymer fromthe film surface, and/or to remove the degradable wrapping polymer fromthe film. The thickness d of the film may then be measured by anysuitable method, such as AFM or stylus profilometry of a scratch ormasked edge of the film. In addition, an absorption spectrum of theundoped film may be measured.

A sample of the film may then be fully doped by immersing the film in aconcentrated solution (greater than 1 mg/mL) of a charge-transfer dopantfor at least approximately 1 minute at approximately 78° C., followed bysubsequent de-doping by immersing the film in a suitable solvent at anappropriate temperature and time of immersion. Alternatively, a sampleof the film may be incrementally doped by sequential immersion insolutions having increasing concentrations (such as between 1 ng/mL and1 mg/mL) of the charge-transfer dopant in a suitable solvent. Once thesample has been doped, the absorption spectrum, sheet resistance R_(sh),and thermopower α may be measured. The sheet resistance R_(sh) may bemeasured by any suitable method, such as linear 4-point proberesistivity, 4-point probe resistivity in the van der Pauw geometry, or2-point probe resistivity. The absorption spectrum and thermopower α maybe measured by the methods discussed above.

The doping of the sample may be performed under different dopingconditions, such as dopant concentration, immersion time, and/ortemperature. As discussed in further detail below, this provides data atmultiple doping levels that can be used to generate plots to assist indetermining doping conditions that result in a desired doping level ofthe s-SWCNT network.

In one example, the absorption spectrum is integrated over a suitablerange to determine the area A_(i) under the absorption spectrum. Therange may include the first (S₁₁) excitonic absorption peak envelope, orthe first (S₁₁) and second (S₂₂) excitonic absorption peak envelopes.Preferably, the range does not include other spectral features that arenot associated with the s-SWCNT, as including the other spectralfeatures could result in an incorrect fractional bleach of theabsorption spectrum. The fractional bleach due to charge carrier dopingis then determined according to:

$\begin{matrix}{\frac{\Delta A}{A_{0}} = \frac{A_{0} - A_{i}}{A_{0}}} & (8)\end{matrix}$

where A₀ is the area under the absorption spectrum of the undoped film,A_(i) is the area under the absorption spectrum of the film at aspecific doping level, and ΔA is the change in the area between theundoped and doped film.

The sheet resistance R_(sh) may be converted to electrical conductivityσ according to:

$\begin{matrix}{\sigma = \frac{1}{R_{sh} \times d}} & (9)\end{matrix}$

The TE power factor may then be calculated as α²σ.

As shown in FIGS. 20(g)-20(i), the TE power factor α²σ may be graphed asa function of the fractional bleach of the absorption spectrum ΔA/A₀.FIG. 20(g) shows a plot of the TE power factor α²σ as a function of thefractional bleach of the absorption spectrum ΔA/A₀ for a PFO-BPy:LVsample with residual PFO-BPy in the LV s-SWCNT network (at anapproximately 1:1 mass ratio), whereas FIGS. 20(h) and 20(i) showsimilar plots of s-SWCNT networks where the polymer has been completelyremoved after (Solid SPR sample) or before (Solution SPR sample) networkformation, respectively.

The fractional bleach of the absorption spectrum ΔA/A₀ may serve as aproxy for the doping level of the s-SWCNT network. Accordingly, as shownin FIGS. 20(g)-20(i), the range of optimum doping may be defined by thefractional bleach of the absorption spectrum ΔA/A₀ that results in adesired TE power factor α²σ for the s-SWCNT network, which may be thepeak TE power factor α²σ. The desired TE power factor α²σ may be asingle TE power factor α²σ, or a range of TE power factors α²σ over acorresponding range of fractional bleach values ΔA/A₀, as indicated bythe two solid vertical lines. As shown in FIGS. 20(d)-20(f), this mayoccur close to the transition between the two conductivity regimes in aplot of electrical conductivity σ as a function of the fractional bleachof the absorption spectrum ΔA/A₀ . The range of optimal dopingcorresponds to the doping conditions for which the desired TE powerfactor α²σ was obtained. Once the range of optimal doping has beendetermined, samples of s-SWCNT networks may be prepared to obtain thedesired TE power factor α²σ by using the corresponding dopingconditions.

Compositions that include single-walled carbon nanotubes (s-SWCNT)and/or s-SWCNT networks having even higher thermoelectric (TE) powerfactors, where achieved using the methods described herein. However,this additional work was done using different dopants, as shown in FIG.22, which illustrates triethyloxonium hexachloroantimonate (OA),2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F₄TCNQ), dodecaborane coreperfunctionalized with 4-trifluoromethylbenzyloxy substituents(DDB-F36), 3,5 -bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyloxy substituents (DDB-F₇₂),and 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyloxy substituents (DDB-F60). So, asdescribed above, this was achieved by probing the electricalconductivity (σ) and optical absorbance as a function of thecharge-carrier concentration induced by redox chemical doping. Incontrast to observations with triethyloxonium hexachloroantimonate (OA),as described above, samples doped with perfunctionalized dodecaborane(DDB) cores did not appear to reach a transition between the twodifferent conductivity regimes that is defined by different slopes inthe plot of a versus ΔA/A₀ as was shown for OA (see FIGS. 20d-f ).Instead, the electrical conductivities of compositions using DDBcontinued to increase as ΔA/A₀ increased (see FIG. 23). This may be dueto the larger size of the functionalized dodecaborane core, which maylimit the coverage of the dopant counterion on the s-SWCNT bundlesurface and therefore the maximum injected charge-carrier density.Despite this potential limitation, all DDB dopants achieved a largerelectrical conductivity (σ) at a given fractional absorbance bleach(ΔA/A₀) than OA-doped networks, suggesting that the charge-carriermobility is improved in the DDB-doped networks.

Consistent with observations for networks of s-SWCNTs prepared by thelaser vaporization of a graphite target method, and subsequently dopedby OA, the improved charge-carrier mobility allows for an enhancedelectrical conductivity. This means that a lower charge-carrier densityis required for a given electrical conductivity, resulting in anincrease in the measured thermopower, which is inversely dependent onthe charge-carrier density. This shifts the thermopower versuselectrical conductivity (α vs. σ) curve up and right (see FIG. 24). Theimproved charge-carrier transport and associated enhancement in thethermopower results in a significant enhancement in the thermoelectricpower factor, exceeding 900 μW m⁻¹ K⁻², as illustrated in FIG. 25.

The observed improvement in the electrical transport and thermoelectricproperties are associated with the size and chemical structure of theperfunctionalized dodecaborane dopants. The electron density extractedfrom the s-SWCNTs in the thin film network are localized on thedodecaborane core, and the functional groups offer sufficient stericbulk to afford significant spatial separation between the injected holedensity in the s-SWCNT bundles and the counter-anion. The reducedcoulombic attraction between the charge-carrier and counterion resultsin the enhanced charge-carrier mobility and improved electricalconductivity.

Methods:

Preparation of s-SWCNT inks: Poly[(9,9-di-n-dodecyl-2,7-fluorendiyl-dimethine)-(1,4-phenylene-dinitrilomethine)](PFPD) was synthesized according to literature procedures (Lei, Journalof the American Chemical Society 2016, 802), which is incorporatedherein by reference in its entirety.

For polymer-wrapping of s-SWCNT, a solution of the polymer was firstprepared with a concentration of 1 mg mL⁻¹ in toluene. The polymersolution was agitated in a heated ultrasonic bath for several minutes toensure full solvation of the polymer.

The raw (unprocessed) plasma-torch (PT) SWCNTs (RN-020) soot, purchasedfrom Nanolntegris, Quebec, Canada, was first rinsed with toluene andcentrifuged to remove soluble fullerenes. The cleaned PT soot was thenadded to the PF-PD polymer solution at a concentration of 1 or 2 mgmL⁻¹, at a ratio determined to optimize the yield and selectivity fors-SWCNT extraction, with maximum volume of ca. 15 mL in a 20 mLborosilicate scintillation vial. The mixture was then placed in anultrasonic bath for at least 1 minute. The nanotube/polymer mixture wasthen processed in the vial with a probe tip ultrasonic processor (ColeParmer CPX-750, ½″ tip) for 15 minutes at 40% amplitude (with anindicated output power of ca. 28 W). During this process, the vial wassubmerged in a bath of dry ice and methanol (or similar), which wasfound to improve the yield of dispersed SWCNTs.

Immediately following the ultrasonic process, the contents of the vialwere transferred to a centrifuge tube and processed at 20° C., 13200rpm, for 5 minutes (Beckman Coulter L-100 XP ultracentrifuge, SW-32 Tirotor). The supernatant containing polymer-wrapped s-SWCNTs and excesspolymer was collected via pipette.

To minimize the concentration of excess polymer in solution, and tocapture excess polymer for re-use, the dispersion super-natant wasreprocessed, but at higher rotational force and reduced temperature,typically at 0° C., 24100 rpm, for 20 hours. The resulting supernatanttypically contained only unbound polymer in solution and could becollected for reuse, while the pellet contained polymer-wrapped s-SWCNTswith very little excess polymer. The s-SWCNT ink was then prepared bydispersing the pellet in neat toluene: typically, multiple pellets couldbe dispersed in one scintillation vial, depending on the desiredconcentration. The pellet(s):toluene combination was then processed in aheated ultrasonic bath for 5 minutes or more to yield a homogeneouspolymer:s-SWCNT ink.

Preparation of s-SWCNT thin films: The ink was then printed at 300 mLmin⁻¹, directed by a stream of dry nitrogen gas at 7 std L min⁻¹, ontoclean glass substrates on a heated stage (130 ±10° C.) using anultrasonic spray head (Sonotek, 0.8 W), with raster pattern designed tomaximize uniformity over the sample area. After printing, the cleavablepolymers were removed by submersion in solution of TFA:toluene at 1:100(by volume) for 1 min at 78° C., followed by submersion in neat toluenefor at least 10 minutes at 78° C. The polymer-removed sample was thendried under nitrogen flow. All of the samples measured were between 20and 100 nm thick, with most films being ca. 40 nm.

p-Type doping of thin films: The thin film was p-type doped bysubmersion in a solution of a charge-transfer dopant in an appropriateorganic solvent. In the case of the one-electron oxidant triethyloxoniumhexachloroantimonate (OA), doping was achieved by submersion in adichloroethane (DCE) solution with concentrations of up to 10 mg mL⁻¹(22.8 mM). Submersion was typically conducted for up to 10 minutes attemperatures up to 70° C. For2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-tetracyanoquinodimethane (F₄TCNQ), doping wasachieved by submersion in a dichloroethane (DCE) solution withconcentrations of up to 2 mg mL⁻¹ (7.4 mM). Submersion was typicallyconducted for up to 10 minutes at temperatures up to 70° C. In the caseof the dodecaborane core perfunctionalized with4-trifluoromethylbenzyloxy substituents (DDB-F36), doping was achievedby submersion in a dichloromethane (DCM) solution with concentrations ofup to 9 mg mL⁻¹ (4 mM). Submersion was typically conducted for up to 10minutes at temperatures up to 35° C.

In the case of the dodecaborane core perfunctionalized with2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyloxy substituents (DDB-F6o), doping wasachieved by submersion in a dichloromethane (DCM) solution withconcentrations of up to 5 mg mL⁻¹ (2 mM). Submersion was typicallyconducted for up to 10 minutes at temperatures up to 35° C. The limitedsolubility of DDB-F₆₀ in DCM encouraged exploration of some mixedsolvent systems including dichloroethane:ortho-dichlorobenzene(DCE:oDCB) at ratios between 5:1 and 10:1, which allowed for doping atelevated temperatures, up to 100° C.

In the case of the dodecaborane core perfunctionalized with3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyloxy substituents (DDB-F₇₂), doping wasachieved by submersion in a dichloromethane (DCM) solution withconcentrations of up to 12 mg mL⁻¹ (4 mM). Submersion was typicallyconducted for up to 10 minutes at temperatures up to 35° C. As withDDB-F₆₀, doping with DDB-F₇₂ can be achieved in other solvents, such asortho-dichlorobenzene (oDCB), that allow higher concentrations to beused.

To determine the maximum power factor, the doping level could bemodified either from the as-printed state, starting at lowerconcentrations and immersion durations and increasing one or both, or bymaximally doping the sample initially, and sequentially de-doping withincreased duration of soaking in an organic solvent to remove dopantcounterions.

Conductivity and thermopower measurements: Generally, the sheetresistance of the thin films was measured using a linear four-pointprobe geometry, via a linear fit on a plot of current vs. voltage. Sheetresistance values were converted to conductivity with the film thicknessmeasured by atomic force microscopy (described below). The thermopowerwas determined using a custom-built apparatus designed to implement theMethod of Four Coefficients. The films were situated on top of twoclosely spaced copper blocks, and thermal and electrical contact betweenthe film and the blocks was established using thin (ca. 2 mm diameter)indium pads on opposite ends of the film. The copper blocks were heatedto generate a temperature gradient across the film, and the Seebeckvoltage was measured at four different temperature gradients, all near298±3 K. The thermopower was determined via linear fit on a plot ofSeebeck voltage vs. temperature difference and was corrected for thebuilt-in thermopowers associated with the indium pads and copper blocks.

Atomic force microscopy: AFM topography measurements for s-SWCNT filmthickness were acquired on a Park AFM equipped with an XE-70 controlleroperating in intermittent contact mode. For s-SWCNT film thicknessmeasurements, thin scratches were made in the film using the sharp tipof a syringe needle. Either side of the scratch was imaged using OlympusAC160TS probes with target amplitudes ranging from 0.75 to 1.00 V. Thes-SWCNT film thickness was calculated based on scans acquired from atleast 3 distinct images on independent scratches at different places onthe sample. All AFM images were acquired at scan rates ranging from 0.2to 0.5 Hz at either 512×512 or 1024×1024 resolution.

The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate theinvention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of thedisclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of theinvention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention shouldbe construed to include everything within the scope of the appendedclaims and equivalents thereof.

What is claimed is:
 1. A composition comprising: a network comprising asemiconducting single-walled carbon nanotube (s-SWCNT), and athermoelectric (TE) power factor between about 180 μW m⁻¹K⁻² and about900 μW m⁻¹K⁻².
 2. The composition of claim 2, further comprising anelectronic band gap between about 0.8 eV and about 1.2 eV.
 3. Thecomposition of claim 1, further comprising a dopant comprising aboron-containing compound.
 4. The composition of claim 3, wherein thedopant is a p-type dopant or an n-type dopant.
 5. The composition ofclaim 4, wherein the dopant is a p-type dopant.
 6. The composition ofclaim 3, wherein the boron-containing compound comprises dodecaborane.7. The composition of claim 6, wherein the dodecaborane isfunctionalized with a group comprising at least one of4-trifluoromethylbenzyloxy, 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyloxy, or2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyloxy
 8. The composition of claim 1, whereinthe s-SWCNT has an average diameter between about 0.7 nm and about 2.0nm.
 9. The composition of claim 8, wherein the average diameter isbetween about 1.0 nm and about 1.1 nm.
 10. The composition of claim 1,wherein at least a portion of the s-SWCNT is a chiral species.
 11. Thecomposition of claim 10, wherein the s-SWCNT comprises a plurality ofchiral species.
 12. The composition of claim 1, further comprising afluorene-based polymer.
 13. The composition of claim 12, wherein thefluorene-based polymer comprises at least one ofpoly[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-co-(6,6′-{2,2′-bipyridine})],poly[(9,9-dihexylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-co-(9,10-anthracene)],poly(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl), orpoly[(9,9-di-n-dodecyl-2,7-fluorendiyl-dimethine)-(1,4-phenylene-dinitrilomethine)](PFPD)].
 14. The composition of claim 12, comprising a ratio of thes-SWCNT to the fluorene-based polymer of between about 1:0 and about1:4.
 15. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a carrierdensity between about 1×10¹⁷ holes/cm³ and about 1×10²⁰ holes/cm³. 16.The composition of claim 1, wherein the network comprises a bundle ofthe s-SWCNT having a size between about 5 nm and about 50 nm.
 17. Thecomposition of claim 1, comprising an electrical conductivity betweenabout 10³ S/m and about 10⁵ S/m.
 18. The composition of claim 17,comprising a thermopower between about 100 μV/K and about 200 μV/K.